Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38257626›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Comparison of Shoulder Range of Motion Quantified with Mobile Phone Video-Based Skeletal Tracking and 3D Motion Capture-Preliminary Study.

Wolbert van den Hoorn, Maxence Lavaill, Kenneth Cutbush, Ashish Gupta, Graham Kerr

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06629038 (A Novel Technique for Estimating Maximal Jaw Movement, Neck and Shoulder Joint Range of Motion Using an Artificial Intelligence Model), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06629038 recruitingnot on this map

A Novel Technique for Estimating Maximal Jaw Movement, Neck and Shoulder Joint Range of Motion Using an Artificial Intelligence Model

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsOral CancerArmsobservation alone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wolbert van den HoornSchool of Exercise & Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9658-2388
Maxence LavaillQueensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research, Brisbane, QLD 4067, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6124-1869
Kenneth CutbushQueensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research, Brisbane, QLD 4067, Australia.
Ashish GuptaQueensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research, Brisbane, QLD 4067, Australia.
Graham KerrSchool of Exercise & Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council IC190100020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe accuracy of human pose tracking using smartphone camera (2D-pose) to quantify shoulder range of motion (RoM) is not determined.

methodsTwenty healthy individuals were recruited and performed shoulder abduction, adduction, flexion, or extension, captured simultaneously using a smartphone-based human pose estimation algorithm (Apple's vision framework) and using a skin marker-based 3D motion capture system. Validity was assessed by comparing the 2D-pose outcomes against a well-established 3D motion capture protocol. In addition, the impact of iPhone positioning was investigated using three smartphones in multiple vertical and horizontal positions. The relationship and validity were analysed using linear mixed models and Bland-Altman analysis.

resultsWe found that 2D-pose-based shoulder RoM was consistent with 3D motion capture (linear mixed model: R

conclusionsShoulder RoM estimated using a smartphone camera is consistent with 3D motion-capture-derived RoM; however, differences between the systems were observed and are likely explained by differences in thoracic frame definitions.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneShoulderHumansMotion CaptureRange of Motion, ArticularSmartphone2D poseclinical assessmenthuman pose trackingrange of motionshouldervalidity

Identifiers

PMID38257626
PMCPMC10818695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.