Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38257616›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

An Electrical Resistance Diagnostic for Conductivity Monitoring in Laser Powder Bed Fusion.

Saptarshi Mukherjee, Edward Benavidez, Michael Crumb, Nicholas P Calta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saptarshi MukherjeeLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0684-1356
Edward BenavidezLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA.
Michael CrumbLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA.
Nicholas P CaltaLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the growing interest in metal additive manufacturing using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), there is a need for advanced in-situ nondestructive evaluation (NDE) methods that can dynamically monitor manufacturing process-related variations, that can be used as a feedback mechanism to further improve the manufacturing process, leading to parts with improved microstructural properties and mechanical properties. Current NDE techniques either lack sensitivity beyond build layer, are costly or time-consuming, or are not compatible for in-situ integration. In this research, we develop an electrical resistance diagnostic for in-situ monitoring of powder fused regions during laser powder bed fusion printing. The technique relies on injecting current into the build plate and detecting voltage differences from conductive variations during printing using a simple, cheap four-point electrode array directly connected to the build plate. A computational model will be utilized to determine sensitivities of the approach, and preliminary experiments will be performed during the printing process to test the overall approach.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingelectrical conductivityelectrical resistance measurementelectrodesfinite difference methodslaser powder bed fusionnondestructive evaluationpoisson equations

Identifiers

PMID38257616
PMCPMC10819052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.