ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
From Anomaly Detection to Defect Classification.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper proposes a new approach to defect detection system design focused on exact damaged areas demonstrated through visual data containing gear wheel images. The main advantage of the system is the capability to detect a wide range of patterns of defects occurring in datasets. The methodology is built on three processes that combine different approaches from unsupervised and supervised methods. The first step is a search for anomalies, which is performed by defining the correct areas on the controlled object by using the autoencoder approach. As a result, the differences between the original and autoencoder-generated images are obtained. These are divided into clusters using the clustering method (DBSCAN). Based on the clusters, the regions of interest are subsequently defined and classified using the pre-trained Xception network classifier. The main result is a system capable of focusing on exact defect areas using the sequence of unsupervised learning (autoencoder)-unsupervised learning (clustering)-supervised learning (classification) methods (U2S-CNN). The outcome with tested samples was 177 detected regions and 205 occurring damaged areas. There were 108 regions detected correctly, and 69 regions were labeled incorrectly. This paper describes a proof of concept for defect detection by highlighting exact defect areas. It can be thus an alternative to using detectors such as YOLO methods, reconstructors, autoencoders, transformers, etc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.