Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38257515›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Sensor-to-Bone Calibration with the Fusion of IMU and Bi-Plane X-rays.

Xavier Gasparutto, Kevin Rose-Dulcina, Gautier Grouvel, Peter DiGiovanni, Lena Carcreff, Didier Hannouche, Stéphane Armand

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xavier GasparuttoKinesiology Laboratory, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8617-6522
Kevin Rose-DulcinaKinesiology Laboratory, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8698-3268
Gautier GrouvelKinesiology Laboratory, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2797-7677
Peter DiGiovanniDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Trauma Care, Surgery Department, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0066-3253
Lena CarcreffKinesiology Laboratory, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0086-4944
Didier HannoucheDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Trauma Care, Surgery Department, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2060-2394
Stéphane ArmandKinesiology Laboratory, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9144-4982
University of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inertial measurement units (IMUs) need sensor-to-segment calibration to measure human kinematics. Multiple methods exist, but, when assessing populations with locomotor function pathologies, multiple limitations arise, including holding postures (limited by joint pain and stiffness), performing specific tasks (limited by lack of selectivity) or hypothesis on limb alignment (limited by bone deformity and joint stiffness). We propose a sensor-to-bone calibration based on bi-plane X-rays and a specifically designed fusion box to measure IMU orientation with respect to underlying bones. Eight patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with bi-plane X-rays in their clinical pathway participated in the study. Patients underwent bi-plane X-rays with fusion box and skin markers followed by a gait analysis with IMUs and a marker-based method. The validity of the pelvis, thigh and hip kinematics measured with a conventional sensor-to-segment calibration and with the sensor-to-bone calibration were compared. Results showed (1) the feasibility of the fusion of bi-plane X-rays and IMUs in measuring the orientation of anatomical axes, and (2) higher validity of the sensor-to-bone calibration for the pelvic tilt and similar validity for other degrees of freedom. The main strength of this novel calibration is to remove conventional hypotheses on joint and segment orientations that are frequently violated in pathological populations.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipCalibrationExtremitiesHumansRadiographyX-Raysbi-plane X-raysfusiongait analysisIMUmedical imagingsensor-to-segment calibration

Identifiers

PMID38257515
PMCPMC10819897
OpenAlexW4390722257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.