ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Non-Repetitive Scanning LiDAR Sensor for Robust 3D Point Cloud Registration in Localization and Mapping Applications.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Performance Evaluation of Multi-Type LiDAR Sensors and Their Applicability to Sidewalk HD Mapping.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Massive Point Cloud Processing for Efficient Construction Quality Inspection and Control.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional point cloud registration is a fundamental task for localization and mapping in autonomous navigation applications. Over the years, registration algorithms have evolved; nevertheless, several challenges still remain. Recently, non-repetitive scanning LiDAR sensors have emerged as a promising 3D data acquisition tool. However, the feasibility of this type of sensor to leverage robust point cloud registration still needs to be ascertained. In this paper, we explore the feasibility of one such LiDAR sensor with a Spirograph-type non-repetitive scanning pattern for robust 3D point cloud registration. We first characterize the data of this unique sensor; then, utilizing these results, we propose a new 3D point cloud registration method that exploits the unique scanning pattern of the sensor to register successive 3D scans. The characteristic equations of the unique scanning pattern, determined during the characterization phase, are used to reconstruct a perfect scan at the target distance. The real scan is then compared with this reconstructed scan to extract objects in the scene. The displacement of these extracted objects with respect to the center of the unique scanning pattern is compared in successive scans to determine the transformations that are then used to register these scans. The proposed method is evaluated on two real and different datasets and compared with other state-of-the-art registration methods. After analysis, the performance (localization and mapping results) of the proposed method is further improved by adding constraints like loop closure and employing a Curve Fitting Derivative Filter (CFDT) to better estimate the trajectory. The results clearly demonstrate the suitability of the sensor for such applications. The proposed method is found to be comparable with other methods in terms of accuracy but surpasses them in performance in terms of processing time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.