Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38257413›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Application of the Five-Step Phase-Shifting Method in Reflective Ghost Imaging for Efficient Phase Reconstruction.

Ziyan Chen, Jing Cheng, Heng Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ziyan ChenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Cyber-Physical System, School of Automation, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1203-7858
Jing ChengSchool of Physics, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China.
Heng WuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Cyber-Physical System, School of Automation, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0832-2218

Funding

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Cyber-Physical System 2020B1212060069the National Natural Science Foundation of China 62173098, U20A6003, U2001201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conventional approach to phase reconstruction in Reflective Ghost Imaging (RGI) typically involves the introduction of three reference screens into the reference path, deeming the Fourier transform step indispensable. However, this method introduces complexity to the system and raises concerns regarding potential errors in phase retrieval. In response to these challenges, we advocate for adopting the Five-Step Phase-Shifting (FSPS) method in the RGI system. This method presents two key advantages over traditional approaches: (1) It streamlines the phase reconstruction process by eliminating the requirement for a Fourier inverse transform. (2) It avoids the need to insert objects into the reference optical path, simplifying the computation of reference optical path intensity and enabling seamless application to Computational Ghost Imaging (CGI), overcoming the constraints of Dual-Arm Ghost Imaging (DAGI). We substantiate the theoretical proposition through numerical simulations involving two intricate objects. Furthermore, our discussion delves into exploring the influence of varying reflective angles on the phase reconstruction performance.

Indexed as

Five-Step Phase-Shifting (FSPS) methodphase reconstructionReflective Ghost Imagingsignal processing

Identifiers

PMID38257413
PMCPMC11154415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.