ArticleNutrients2024
Consumption Trends and Eating Context of Lentils and Dried Peas in the United States: A Nationally Representative Study.
Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolizable Energy Value of Chickpeas and Lentils in the Human Diet: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Nutrients · 2025Trial
- Legume consumption among Israeli adults: results from a national health and nutrition survey.European journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- Predicting consumption of the USDA protein sub-recommendations among adults: a reasoned action approach.Health promotion perspectives · 2025Article
- Consumption of Barley, Buckwheat and Quinoa in the United States: Associations with Diet and Metabolic Health.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Assessing the nutrient intake and diet quality of adults wearing dentures using the healthy eating index.BMC oral health · 2025Observational
- Pulse consumption trends in the US in the context of 2025-30 Dietary Guidelines for Americans: analyses of NHANES data for 1999-2018.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIncorporation of lentils and dried peas could form the basis of a nutrient-rich diet; yet, they are among the least-consumed legumes in the United States (US). The objective of this study was to examine the prevalence of lentils/dried peas consumption in the US over time and across socio-demographic groups, as well as to examine the eating context of these foods.
methodsAnalyses included adults (aged 18 years or older) and children (aged 3-17 years) participating in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2004 through 2017-2018. Participants consuming lentils/dried peas on one or both of the 24-h dietary recalls were categorized as consumers.
resultsAlthough an increasing time trend in prevalence of consumption was observed over the study period, prevalence of lentils/dried peas consumption was less than 7% in NHANES 2017-2018 in adults and children. Demographic differences were observed, such that a greater proportion of non-Hispanic Asians were classified as consumers. Lentils/dried peas were primarily obtained from grocery stores and supermarkets.
conclusionsAlthough there are signs of rising acceptance of dried peas and lentils, the low prevalence of lentils/dried peas consumption suggests that understanding barriers to consumption of these foods could further identify opportunities to improve their consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.