Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38257106›Full record

ArticleNutrients2024

Parent Perceptions and Opinions of Universal Free School Meals in Arizona.

Sarah Martinelli, Emily M Melnick, Francesco Acciai, Ashley St Thomas, Punam Ohri-Vachaspati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah MartinelliCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.
Emily M MelnickCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3497-5626
Francesco AcciaiCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7881-7593
Ashley St ThomasArizona Food Bank Network, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.
Punam Ohri-VachaspatiCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9619-9816

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To support families during the COVID-19 pandemic, the USDA allowed all US schools to offer meals at no cost regardless of family income, a policy referred to as Universal Free Meals or Healthy School Meals for All (HSM4A). Despite the recognized benefits and popularity of HSM4A during the pandemic, the policy expired in June 2022. The goal of this study was to gather perceptions of parents in Arizona about school meals, the HSM4A program, and the discontinuation of HSM4A. In collaboration with a local anti-hunger group, using an online survey distributed in September and October 2022, we collected data from a diverse sample of over 2000 parents living in Arizona. Parents unequivocally supported HSM4A during the pandemic (97%) and expressed support for continuing to offer HSM4A (95%). High levels of support were seen across all groups in the study, including from individuals who identified as politically conservative. We also analyzed 750 responses to an open-ended question asking respondents to share their thoughts about offering meals to all Arizona students regardless of family income. The majority of emergent themes related to perceived benefits of HSM4A, including reducing financial burden and stress for families. Our findings will be useful for advocates and policy makers considering HSM4A legislation.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsArizonaHumansMealsParentsfood policyhealthy school meals for allschool mealsuniversal fee meals

Identifiers

PMID38257106
PMCPMC10820707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.