Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38257105›Full record

ArticleNutrients2024

The Validity and Feasibility of Utilizing the Photo-Assisted Dietary Intake Assessment among College Students and Elderly Individuals in China.

Rui Fan, Qianqian Chen, Lixia Song, Shuyue Wang, Mei You, Meng Cai, Xinping Wang, Yong Li, Meihong Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rui FanDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Qianqian ChenDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0116-8003
Lixia SongDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Shuyue WangDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Mei YouDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Meng CaiDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Xinping WangDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Yong LiDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3914-5840
Meihong XuDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7201-6982

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary assessments hold significant importance within the field of public health. However, the current methods employed for dietary assessments face certain limitations and challenges that necessitate improvement. The aim of our study was to develop a reliable and practical dietary assessment tool known as photo-assisted dietary intake assessment (PAD). In order to evaluate its validity, we conducted an analysis on a sample of 71 college students' dinners at a buffet in a canteen. We compared estimates of food weights obtained through the 24-h recall (24 HR) or PAD method with those obtained through the weighing method; we also evaluated the feasibility of PAD for recording dinner intakes among a sample of college students (n = 76) and elderly individuals (n = 121). In addition, we successfully identified the dietary factors that have a significant impact on the bias observed in weight estimation. The findings of the study indicated that the PAD method exhibited a higher level of consistency with the weighing method compared to the 24 HR method. The discrepancy in D% values between cereals (14.28% vs. 40.59%,

Indexed as

MeatNutrition AssessmentAgedChinaEatingEdible GrainFeasibility StudiesHumansStudentsVegetablesChinese elderly individualscollege studentsdietary assessmentfood weightphoto-assisted dietary intake assessment (PAD)

Identifiers

PMID38257105
PMCPMC10818835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.