ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Pharmacogenetic Testing as Guides to Psychotropic Drug Dose Adjustment: An Observational Study.
Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacogenetics of antidepressant response: a focused review on CYP2C19, CYP2D6, SLC6A4, and HTR2A polymorphisms.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Review
- Proportion of Antipsychotics with CYP2D6 Pharmacogenetic (PGx) Associations Prescribed in an Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Cohort: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To avoid the failures in therapy with psychotropic drugs, treatments can be personalized by applying the results of therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetic testing. The objective of the present single-center observational study was to describe the changes in psychotropic drug management prompted by therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetic testing, and to compare the effective drug concentration based on metabolic status with the dose predicted using an in silico decision tool for drug-drug interactions. The study was conducted in psychiatry wards at Lille University Hospital (Lille, France) between 2016 and 2020. Patients with data for at least one therapeutic drug monitoring session or pharmacogenetic test were included. Blood tests were performed for 490 inpatients (mainly indicated by treatment monitoring or failure) and mainly concerned clozapine (21.4%) and quetiapine (13.7%). Of the 617 initial therapeutic drug monitoring tests, 245 (40%) complied with good sampling practice. Of the patients, 51% had a drug concentration within the therapeutic range. Regardless of the drug concentration, the drug management did not change in 83% of cases. Thirty patients underwent pharmacogenetic testing (twenty-seven had also undergone therapeutic drug monitoring) for treatment failure; the plasma drug concentration was outside the reference range in 93% of cases. The patient's metabolic status explained the treatment failure in 12 cases (40%), and prompted a switch to a drug metabolized by another CYP450 pathway in 5 cases (42%). Of the six tests that could be analyzed with the in silico decision tool, all of the drug concentrations after adjustment were included in the range estimated by the tool. Knowledge of a patient's drug concentration and metabolic status (for CYD2D6 and CYP2C19) can help clinicians to optimize psychotropic drug adjustment. Drug management can be optimized with good sampling practice, support from a multidisciplinary team (a physician, a geneticist, and clinical pharmacist), and decision support tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.