Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38256696›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Argatroban as an Add-On to rtPA in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

David-Dimitris Chlorogiannis, Theodoros Mavridis, Anastasia Adamou, Ioannis Kyriakoulis, Iliana Stamatiou, Polyxeni Botou, Hui-Sheng Chen, George Ntaios

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David-Dimitris ChlorogiannisDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1596-9466
Theodoros Mavridis1st Department of Neurology, Eginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5952-5106
Anastasia AdamouDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41334 Larissa, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-4701-0858
Ioannis KyriakoulisDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41334 Larissa, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-2970-088X
Iliana StamatiouDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID 0009-0007-6458-8201
Polyxeni BotouDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Hippocration General Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Hui-Sheng ChenDepartment of Neurology, General Hospital of Northern Theatre Command, Shenyang 110017, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7486-1992
George NtaiosDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41334 Larissa, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0629-9248

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current treatment options for acute ischemic stroke, including intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and mechanical thrombectomy, have undoubtedly revolutionized stroke care. The need for additional treatment options has brought into the light direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) and, specifically, argatroban as a promising candidate. However, there is uncertainty regarding the safety of adding argatroban to IVT, mainly due to the increased hemorrhagic risk. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the safety and efficacy of argatroban as an add-on treatment for IVT. The following databases were searched from inception until the 14th of May 2023: Pubmed/MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, the EU Clinical Trials Register, EMBASE/Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) enrolling patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent IVT evaluating the add-on use of any DTIs were selected for the systematic review and further meta-analysis. The PRISMA guidelines were followed at all stages. Four studies with argatroban were included in the final analysis. Analysis of risk ratio and relative risk shows that the add-on therapy with argatroban seems to be effective and favors a good clinical outcome (mRS 0-2) at 90 days, similar to that of alteplase. All studies showed a low pooled incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (5%), parenchymal hematoma (3%), and other major bleeding (1%). Argatroban as an add-on treatment to IVT seems not to be associated with excessive bleeding risk; however, its efficacy remains unproven. According to this synopsis of the currently available evidence, it is premature to use argatroban as an add-on to IVT treatment outside the current clinical trial setting.

Indexed as

acute ischemic strokeargatrobanbivalirudindabigatrandesirudindirect thrombin inhibitorsDTIsendovascular thrombectomyEVTintravenous thrombolysislepirudinmelagatrantPAximelagatran

Identifiers

PMID38256696
PMCPMC10816854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.