Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38256689›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024

Adalimumab Persistence and Its Biosimilar in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Real-World Study.

María Carmen Fernández-Cano, Antonio Jesús Fernández-Cano, María Mar Martín-Rodríguez, Antonio Damián Sánchez-Capilla, María José Cabello-Tapia, Eduardo Redondo-Cerezo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

María Carmen Fernández-CanoGastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, 18014 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3818-0003
Antonio Jesús Fernández-CanoCitizen Innovation Department, Consortium for Developing the Information and Knowledge Society in Andalusia "Fernando de los Ríos", 18016 Granada, Spain.
María Mar Martín-RodríguezGastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, 18014 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2140-7825
Antonio Damián Sánchez-CapillaGastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, 18014 Granada, Spain.
María José Cabello-TapiaGastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, 18014 Granada, Spain.
Eduardo Redondo-CerezoGastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, 18014 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5932-8540
Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves · ESUniversidad de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adalimumab biosimilar experience is still recent. Interchangeability differences could reduce persistence times. Our goal was to compare biosimilar persistence differences with a reference. A retrospective observational study was performed in three groups divided according to the adalimumab received. The primary outcome measure was persistence, represented with Kaplan-Meier analysis, and we secondarily evaluated security, efficacy, and biomarkers. We obtained approval from the regional ethical committee, and the study was conducted following the Helsinki Declaration as revised in 2013. Data from 104 patients were collected: 50 received the biosimilar, 29 received the reference, and 25 switched from the original to the biosimilar. After a follow-up of 12 months, the biosimilar's persistence was higher, without differences in mild adverse events per group. In contrast, there were differences in severe events, with the switched group's frequency being higher. Biomarkers were reduced at similar proportions in all groups, and 43% had a clinical response at week 20 without differences. Adalimumab biosimilars are a valuable option for IBD based on clinical equivalence that are less expensive than the original drug. Their use does not have a detrimental influence on disease, although there are a few nuances in terms of interchangeability. These results support increasing confidence in using biosimilars, thus promoting the better sustainability of health systems.

Indexed as

adalimumabbiosimilardrug switchinginflammatory bowel diseaseinterchangeabilitymultiswitchingpersistence

Identifiers

PMID38256689
PMCPMC10816059
OpenAlexW4390974689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.