Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38256573›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024

Three Years of Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring on the General Surgical Ward: Is It Sustainable? A Qualitative Study.

Harm H J van Noort, Femke L Becking-Verhaar, Wilmieke Bahlman-van Ooijen, Maarten Pel, Harry van Goor, Getty Huisman-de Waal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Transforming in-clinic post-operative and intermediate care with cosinuss°.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harm H J van NoortDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9467-8434
Femke L Becking-VerhaarDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3297-4032
Wilmieke Bahlman-van OoijenDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9251-4874
Maarten PelDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Harry van GoorDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0323-4876
Getty Huisman-de WaalDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2811-4176
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous monitoring of vital signs using a wireless wearable device was implemented in 2018 at a surgical care unit of an academic hospital. This study aimed at gaining insight into nurses' and patients' perspectives regarding the use and innovation of a continuous vital signs monitoring system, three years after its introduction. This qualitative study was performed in a surgical, non-intensive care unit of an academic hospital in 2021. Key-user nurses (nurses with additional training and expertise with the device) and patients were selected for semi-structured interviews, and nurses from the ward were selected for a focus group interview using a topic list. Transcripts of the audio tapes were deductively analysed using four dimensions for adoptions of information and communication technologies (ICT) devices in healthcare. The device provided feelings of safety for nurses and patients. Nurses and patients had a few issues with the device, including the size and the battery life. Nurses gained knowledge and skills in using the system for measurement and interpretations. They perceived the system as a tool to improve the recognition of clinical decline. The use of the system could be further developed regarding the technical device's characteristics, nurses' interpretation of the data and the of type of alarms, the information needs of patients, and clarification of the definition and standardization of continuous monitoring. Three years after the introduction, wireless continuous vital signs monitoring is the new standard of care according to the end-users at the general surgical ward.

Indexed as

clinical deteriorationcontinuous vital sign monitoringmonitoringvital signswearable electronic devices

Identifiers

PMID38256573
PMCPMC10816891
OpenAlexW4390878570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.