Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38256522›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024

Analgesic Strategies for Urologic Videolaparoscopic or Robotic Surgery in the Context of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol: A Prospective Study Comparing Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block.

Marco Micali, Giada Cucciolini, Giulia Bertoni, Michela Gandini, Marco Lattuada, Gregorio Santori, Carlo Introini, Francesco Corradi, Claudia Brusasco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marco MicaliAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genoa, Italy.
Giada CuccioliniDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9456-439X
Giulia BertoniAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, NOA-Nuovo Ospedale Apuano, 54100 Massa, Italy.
Michela GandiniAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genoa, Italy.
Marco LattuadaAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genoa, Italy.
Gregorio SantoriDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, 16126 Genoa, Italy.
Carlo IntroiniDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, Urology Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 12128 Genoa, Italy.
Francesco CorradiDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5588-2608
Claudia BrusascoAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6709-6172
Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITOspedale di Prato Santo Stefano · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regional anesthesia in postoperative pain management has developed in recent years, especially with the advent of fascial plane blocks. This study aims to compare the ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) versus the ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) on postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic or robotic urologic surgery. This was a prospective observational study; 97 patients (ESPB-group) received bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB with 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.375% plus 0.5 mcg/kg of dexmedetomidine in each side at the level of T7-T9 and 93 patients (TAPB-group) received bilateral ultrasound-guided TAPB with 20 mL ropivacaine 0.375% or 0.25%. The primary outcome was the postoperative numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score, which was significantly lower in the ESPB group on postoperative days 0, 1, 2, and 3 (

Indexed as

abdominal surgeryERAS protocollaparoscopic urologic surgeryopioid-free analgesiaopioid-sparing analgesiaplexus abdominal blockspostoperative analgesiapost-operative nausea and vomitingpostoperative painrobotic urologic surgery

Identifiers

PMID38256522
PMCPMC10816131
OpenAlexW4390705207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.