Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38256490›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Endometriosis Predictive Models Based on Self-Assessment Questionnaire, Evidence from Clinical Examination or Imaging Findings: A Narrative Review.

Fani Gkrozou, Orestis Tsonis, Felice Sorrentino, Luigi Nappi, Anastasia Vatopoulou, Chara Skentou, Suruchi Pandey, Minas Paschopoulos, Angelos Daniilidis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Fani GkrozouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, 451 10 Ioannina, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-7164-8603
Orestis TsonisAssisted Conception Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0404-994X
Felice SorrentinoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Foggia, 71121 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3993-2895
Luigi NappiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Foggia, 71121 Foggia, Italy.
Anastasia VatopoulouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, 451 10 Ioannina, Greece.
Chara SkentouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, 451 10 Ioannina, Greece.
Suruchi PandeyDepartment of Gynaecology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Minas PaschopoulosDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, 451 10 Ioannina, Greece.
Angelos Daniilidis2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hippokration General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece.
University Hospital of Ioannina · GRUniversity of Foggia · ITAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this narrative review is to evaluate existing questionnaires on predictive models for endometriosis. These symptom-based models have the potential to serve as screening tools for adult women to detect endometriosis. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search of PubMed and Embase databases was conducted to identify studies on endometriosis screening. SELECTION OF STUDIES: The search targeted predictive models for endometriosis localisation, bowel involvement, need for bowel surgery and fertility. Due to the heterogeneity identified, a systematic review was not possible. A total of 23 studies were identified. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Among these studies, twelve included measures for general endometriosis, two targeted specific sites, four focused on deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), and three addressed the need for endometriosis-related bowel surgery. Many measures combined clinical, imaging and laboratory tests with patient questionnaires. Validation of these models as screening tools was lacking in all studies, as the focus was on diagnosis rather than screening.

conclusionThis review did not identify any fully validated, symptom-based questionnaires for endometriosis screening in adult women. Substantial validation work remains to establish the efficacy of such tools.

Indexed as

chronic pelvic painendometriosispredictive modelspregnancyself-assessment questionnairetreatment

Identifiers

PMID38256490
PMCPMC10816076
OpenAlexW4390746815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.