Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38256089›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

A Review of Numerical Models of Radiation Injury and Repair Considering Subcellular Targets and the Extracellular Microenvironment.

Nousha Afshari, Igor Koturbash, Marjan Boerma, Wayne Newhauser, Maria Kratz, Jeffrey Willey, Jacqueline Williams, Jeffery Chancellor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Breakthroughs in modern brachytherapy are transforming cancer care.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nousha AfshariDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Igor KoturbashDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4090-7008
Marjan BoermaDivision of Radiation Health, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2249-5203
Wayne NewhauserDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Maria KratzDepartment of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Jeffrey WilleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA.
Jacqueline WilliamsSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Jeffery ChancellorDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.

Funding

Louisiana Space Grant Consortium 80NSSC20M0110National Aeronautics and Space Agency (NASA) 80NSSC21K0544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Astronauts in space are subject to continuous exposure to ionizing radiation. There is concern about the acute and late-occurring adverse health effects that astronauts could incur following a protracted exposure to the space radiation environment. Therefore, it is vital to consider the current tools and models used to describe and study the organic consequences of ionizing radiation exposure. It is equally important to see where these models could be improved. Historically, radiobiological models focused on how radiation damages nuclear deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and the role DNA repair mechanisms play in resulting biological effects, building on the hypotheses of Crowther and Lea from the 1940s and 1960s, and they neglected other subcellular targets outside of nuclear DNA. The development of these models and the current state of knowledge about radiation effects impacting astronauts in orbit, as well as how the radiation environment and cellular microenvironment are incorporated into these radiobiological models, aid our understanding of the influence space travel may have on astronaut health. It is vital to consider the current tools and models used to describe the organic consequences of ionizing radiation exposure and identify where they can be further improved.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsRadiation ExposureRadiation InjuriesAstronautsCellular MicroenvironmentDNAHumansDNADNA damageDNA repair mechanismsGCRHZEmitochondrial DNAmitochondrionnuclear DNAorganellesradiationradiobiology

Identifiers

PMID38256089
PMCPMC10816679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.