Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38255459›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Micro- and Nano-Roughness Separation Based on Fractal Analysis.

Árpád Czifra, Erzsébet Ancza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Árpád CzifraInstitute of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, Óbuda University, 1034 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-2867-9687
Erzsébet AnczaInstitute for Natural Sciences and Basic Subjects, Óbuda University, 1034 Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When describing the tribological behaviour of technical surfaces, the need for full-length scale microtopographic characterization often arises. The self-affine of surfaces and the characterisation of self-affine using a fractal dimension and its implantation into tribological models are commonly used. The goal of our present work was to determine the frequency range of fractal behaviour of surfaces by analysing the microtopographic measurements of an anodised aluminium brake plunger. We also wanted to know if bifractal and multifractal behaviour can be detected in real machine parts. As a result, we developed a new methodology for determining the fractal range boundaries to separate the nano- and micro-roughness. To reach our goals, we used an atomic force microscope (AFM) and a stylus instrument to obtain measurements in a wide frequency range (19 nm-3 mm). Power spectral density (PSD)-based fractal evaluation found that the examined surface could not be characterised by a single fractal dimension. A new method capable of separating nano- and micro-roughness has been developed for investigating multifractal behaviour. The presented procedure separates nano- and micro-roughness based on the geometric characteristics of surfaces. In this way, it becomes possible to specifically examine the relationship between the micro-geometry that can be measured in each wavelength range and the effects of cutting technology and the material structure that creates them.

Indexed as

dominant wavelengthfractalfull-length scalemicrotopographynano-roughnesspower spectral densityroughness

Identifiers

PMID38255459
PMCPMC10821031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.