Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38255410›Full record

ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Screening of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Europe: A Systematic Review.

Wojciech Krysta, Patryk Dudek, Łukasz Pulik, Paweł Łęgosz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. An Examination of Screening Practices for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Across Sri Lankan Medical Specialties.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wojciech KrystaStudent Scientific Association of Reconstructive and Oncology Orthopaedics, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-005 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0009-0004-4700-1366
Patryk DudekStudent Scientific Association of Reconstructive and Oncology Orthopaedics, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-005 Warsaw, Poland.
Łukasz PulikDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-005 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4953-0075
Paweł ŁęgoszDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-005 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9799-5750
Medical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDevelopmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a prevalent orthopaedic disorder in children, and screening methods vary across regions due to local health policies. The purpose of this review is to systematise the different ultrasound screening strategies for detecting DDH in newborns in Europe.

methodsEligible studies from the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases, published between 1 January 2018 and 18 March 2023, were included. The inclusion criteria specified a European origin, a focus on newborn human patients, and information on ultrasound for DDH detection.

resultsIn total, 45 studies were included, covering 18 countries. Among them, six nations (Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Poland, Slovenia, the Czech Republic, and Germany) perform universal ultrasound screening. The timing of the first ultrasound varies, with Austria and the Czech Republic within the 1st week, Bosnia and Herzegovina on the day of birth, Poland between 1 and 12 weeks, and Germany before the 6th week. The Graf method is the most popular ultrasound technique used.

conclusionsThere is no consensus on the optimal DDH detection approach in Europe. Varied screening methods stem from epidemiological, cultural, and economic differences among countries.

Indexed as

developmental dysplasia of the hiphumansnewbornscreeningultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID38255410
PMCPMC10814691
OpenAlexW4390875678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.