Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38255272›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2024

Double-Negative T (DNT) Cells in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Dimitri Poddighe, Kuanysh Dossybayeva, Samat Kozhakhmetov, Rafail Rozenson, Maykesh Assylbekova

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. (TCRαβCells · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Neuroprotective role of DNTαβ Cell transplantation on modulating immune microenvironment in spinal cord injured mice.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Nonspecific increase of αβTCRWorld journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2024
    Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Lupus Nephritis from Pathogenesis to New Therapies: An Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dimitri PoddigheSchool of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-6431-9334
Kuanysh DossybayevaSchool of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-1834-1909
Samat KozhakhmetovCenter for Life Science, National Laboratory Astana, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-9668-0327
Rafail RozensonDepartment of Children's Diseases n.1, Astana Medical University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
Maykesh AssylbekovaClinical Academic Department of Pediatrics, National Research Center for Maternal and Child Health, University Medical Center, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
National Research Center for Maternal and Child Health · KZAstana Medical University · KZNazarbayev University · KZ

Funding

Nazarbayev University 20122022CRP1604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Double-negative T (DNT) cells are a rare and unconventional T-lymphocyte subpopulation lacking both CD4 and CD8 markers. Their immunopathological roles and clinical relevance have yet to be elucidated. Beyond autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS), these cells may also play a role in rheumatic disorders, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); indeed, these two diseases share several autoimmune manifestations (including nephritis). Moreover, one of the main experimental murine models used to investigate lupus, namely the MRL/lpr mouse, is characterized by an expansion of DNT cells, which can support the production of pathogenic autoantibodies and/or modulate the immune response in this context. However, lupus murine models are not completely consistent with their human SLE counterpart, of course. In this mini review, we summarize and analyze the most relevant clinical studies investigating the DNT cell population in SLE patients. Overall, based on the present literature review and analysis, DNT cell homeostasis seems to be altered in patients with SLE. Indeed, most of the available clinical studies (which include both adults and children) reported an increased DNT cell percentage in SLE patients, especially during the active phases, even though no clear correlation with disease activity and/or inflammatory parameters has been clearly established. Well-designed, standardized, and longitudinal clinical studies focused on DNT cell population are needed, in order to further elucidate the actual contribution of these cells in SLE pathogenesis and their interactions with other immune cells (also implicated and/or altered in SLE, such as basophils), and clarify whether their expansion and/or immunophenotypic aspects may have any immunopathological relevance (and, then, represent potential disease markers and, in perspective, even therapeutic targets) or are just an unspecific epiphenomenon of autoimmunity.

Indexed as

DN T cellsDNT cellsdouble-negative T cellslupusMRL/lpr mousesystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID38255272
PMCPMC10812956
OpenAlexW4390824451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.