Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38255261›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2024

Do the Differences in the Epiligament of the Proximal and Distal Parts of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Explain Their Different Healing Capacities? Quantitative and Immunohistochemical Analysis of CD34 and α-SMA Expression in Relation to the Epiligament Theory.

Georgi P Georgiev, Yordan Yordanov, Łukasz Olewnik, Richard Shane Tubbs, Robert F LaPrade, Julian Ananiev, Svetoslav A Slavchev, Iva N Dimitrova, Lyubomir Gaydarski, Boycho Landzhov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Georgi P GeorgievDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Queen Giovanna-ISUL, Medical University of Sofia, 1527 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-8343-0337
Yordan YordanovDepartment of Pharmacology, Pharmacotherapy and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0003-1029-9870
Łukasz OlewnikDepartment of Anatomical Dissection and Donation, Chair of Anatomy and Histology, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6414-9504
Richard Shane TubbsDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, St. George's University, St. George 1473, Grenada.
Robert F LaPradeTwin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, MN 55435, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9823-2306
Julian AnanievDepartment of General and Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Trakia University, 6000 Stara Zagora, Bulgaria.
Svetoslav A SlavchevUniversity Hospital of Orthopedics "Prof. B. Boychev", Medical University of Sofia, 1614 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Iva N DimitrovaDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital "St. Ekaterina", Medical University of Sofia, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Lyubomir GaydarskiDepartment of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Medical University of Sofia, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0003-4774-6507
Boycho LandzhovDepartment of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Medical University of Sofia, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Medical University of Sofia · BGMedical University of Lodz · PLTrakia University · BGTulane University · USTwin Cities Orthopedics · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the epiligament theory by determining the normal epiligament morphology of the proximal and distal parts of the anterior cruciate ligament in humans and analyzing the differences between them and the midportion of the ligament in terms of cell numbers and expression of CD34 and α-SMA. Samples were obtained from the anterior cruciate ligaments of 12 fresh knee joints. Monoclonal antibodies against CD34 and α-SMA were used for immunohistochemistry. Photomicrographs were analyzed using ImageJ software, version 1.53f. The cell density was higher in the epiligament than in the ligament connective tissue. Cell counts were higher in the proximal and distal thirds than in the midsubstance of the epiligament. CD34 was expressed similarly in the proximal and distal thirds, although it seemed slightly more pronounced in the distal third. α-SMA expression was more robust in the proximal than the distal part. The results revealed that CD34 and α-SMA are expressed in the human epiligament. The differences between the numbers of cells in the proximal and distal parts of the epiligament and the expression of CD34 and α-SMA enhance epiligament theory. Future investigations into improving the quality of ligament healing should not overlook the epiligament theory.

Indexed as

anterior cruciate ligamentepiligamentepiligament theoryhumankneemedial collateral ligament

Identifiers

PMID38255261
PMCPMC10813037
OpenAlexW4390740090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.