Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38255208›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2024

Comparative Study between the Diagnostic Effectiveness of Brain SPECT with [

Javier Villena-Salinas, Simeón José Ortega-Lozano, Tomader Amrani-Raissouni, Eduardo Agüera-Morales, Javier Caballero-Villarraso

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Javier Villena-SalinasNuclear Medicine Service, Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital, 29010 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1457-5190
Simeón José Ortega-LozanoNuclear Medicine Service, Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital, 29010 Málaga, Spain.
Tomader Amrani-RaissouniNuclear Medicine Service, Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital, 29010 Málaga, Spain.
Eduardo Agüera-MoralesNeurology Service, Reina Sofia University Hospital, 14004 Cordoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8604-2054
Javier Caballero-VillarrasoMaimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba (IMIBIC), 14004 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0571-5147
Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria · ESInstituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple system atrophy (MSA) is a neurodegenerative disease. It has a fast progression, so early diagnosis is decisive. Two functional imaging tests can be involved in its diagnosis: [

methods46 patients (24 males and 22 females) with MSA underwent [

resultsSPECT visual assessment was positive in 93.5% of subjects (S = 95.24%; PPV = 93.02%). A cut-off of 1.363 was established for overall S/O index (S = 85.7%, E = 100%). Visual assessment of scintigraphy was positive in 73.1% (S = 78.57%, PPV = 94.29%). For the delayed heart/medistinum ratio (HMR) a cut-off of 1.43 (S = 85.3, E = 100%) was obtained. For each unit increase in delayed HMR, the suspicion of MSA increased by 1.58 (OR = 1.58,

conclusionsBoth tests are useful in MSA diagnosis. Comparatively, we did not observe a clear superiority of either. Striatal and myocardial deterioration do not evolve in parallel. Qualitative assessment is crucial in both techniques, together with the support of quantitative analysis. Delayed HMR shows a direct relationship with the risk of MSA.

Indexed as

diagnostic accuracydysautonomiaIoflupane-123meta-iodobenzylguanidine-123multiple system atrophy

Identifiers

PMID38255208
PMCPMC10813386
OpenAlexW4390546982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.