Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38255046›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Assessing the Link between Nurses' Proficiency and Situational Awareness in Neonatal Care Practice Using an Eye Tracker: An Observational Study Using a Simulator.

Masahiro Sugimoto, Michiko Oyamada, Atsumi Tomita, Chiharu Inada, Mitsue Sato

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Masahiro SugimotoInstitute for Advanced Biosciences, Keio University, Tsuruoka 997-0052, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3316-2543
Michiko OyamadaFaculty of Human Care Department, Tohto University, 1-1 Hinode-cho, Numazu 410-0032, Japan.
Atsumi TomitaInstitute of Medical Sciences, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-0022, Japan.
Chiharu InadaFaculty of Nursing, Japanese Red Cross College of Nursing, 4-1-3 Hiroo, Shibuya, Tokyo 150-0012, Japan.
Mitsue SatoDepartment of Nursing, Kiryu University, Midori 379-2392, Japan.
Tokyo Medical University · JPJapanese Red Cross College of Nursing · JPKiryu University · JPNihon Institute of Medical Science · JP

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI JP21K19673JSPS KAKENHI JP22K11039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nurses are expected to depend on a wide variety of visually available pieces of patient information to understand situations. Thus, we assumed a relationship between nurses' skills and their gaze trajectories. An observational study using a simulator was conducted to analyze gaze during neonatal care practice using eye tracking. We defined the face, thorax, and abdomen of the neonate, the timer, and the pulse oximeter as areas of interest (AOIs). We compared the eye trajectories for respiration and heart rate assessment between 7 experienced and 13 novice nurses. There were no statistically significant differences in the time spent on each AOI for breathing or heart rate confirmation. However, in novice nurses, we observed a significantly higher number of instances of gazing at the thorax and abdomen. The deviation in the number of instances of gazing at the face was also significantly higher among novice nurses. These results indicate that experienced and novice nurses differ in their gaze movements during situational awareness. These objective and quantitative differences in gaze trajectories may help to establish new educational tools for less experienced nurses.

Indexed as

eye trackingmidwiferyneonatal carenursing

Identifiers

PMID38255046
PMCPMC10815009
OpenAlexW4390781722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.