ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Knowledge and Visual Differentiation Ability of the Pressure Injury Classification System and Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis among Hospital Nurses: A Descriptive Study.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Symptom heterogeneity and factors associated with dignity-related distress in older adults with incontinence-associated dermatitis.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Investigation of Pressure Injuries With Visual ChatGPT Integration: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- [Home health care advanced practice nurses' ability to visually differentiate pressure injuries and incontinence-associated dermatitis in Korea: a cross-sectional study].Journal of Korean biological nursing science · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Nurses' Knowledge of Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis Among Acute Care Nurses: A Multi-Center Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Effect of an Online Educational Program on Nurses' Knowledge of Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis.International wound journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Nurses' Knowledge Regarding Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated clinical nurses' knowledge and visual differentiation ability of the pressure injury classification system (PICS) and incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD), additionally analyzing possible influencing factors. A convenience sample of 248 nurses took the PICS and IAD knowledge test (KT) and completed the visual differentiation ability test (VDAT), consisting of 21 photographs with clinical information. The overall mean score for correct answers was 12.65 ± 2.90 points in PICS and IAD KT and 11.43 ± 4.57 points in VDAT. Incorrect responses were most common for statements related to stage II, III, IAD for PICS and IAD KT, and deep tissue pressure injury (DTPI), unstageable, and stage III for VDAT. Significant correlations were found between PICS and IAD KT and VDAT (r = 0.252,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.