Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38255033›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

An Exploration of Pediatricians' Professional Identities: A Q-Methodology Study.

Mao-Meng Tiao, Yu-Che Chang, Liang-Shiou Ou, Chi-Fa Hung, Madalitso Khwepeya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mao-Meng TiaoDepartment of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0338-3495
Yu-Che ChangCollege of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
Liang-Shiou OuChang Gung Medical Education Research Centre, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
Chi-Fa HungDepartment of Psychology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan.
Madalitso KhwepeyaChang Gung Medical Education Research Centre, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4551-338X

Funding

Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital CDRPG8L0061National Science and Technology Council MOST109-2511-H-182-010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Professional identities may influence a wide range of attitudes, ethical standards, professional commitments and patient safety. This study aimed to explore the important elements that comprise pediatricians' professional identities. A Q-methodology was used to identify the similarities and differences in professional identity. Forty pediatricians were recruited from two tertiary referral hospitals in Taiwan. A list of statements was developed by five attending physicians and three residents. R software was used to analyze the Q-sorts to load the viewpoints and formulate the viewpoint arrays. Additional qualitative data-one-to-one personal interviews-were analyzed. Twenty-eight of forty pediatricians, 11 males and 17 females, with an average age of 39.9 (27-62) years, were associated with four viewpoints. We labeled the four viewpoints identified for professional identity as (1) professional recognition, (2) patient communication, (3) empathy and (4) insight. The professional recognition viewpoint comprised of youngest participants-28-36 years-with the majority as residents (77.8%), while the empathy viewpoint comprised the oldest participants-38-62 years-with all as attending physicians. All participants in the empathy and insight viewpoints were married. This study found professional identity to be a multifaceted concept for pediatricians, especially in the areas of professional recognition, patient communication, empathy and insight into patient care.

Indexed as

identitypediatriciansprofessionalQ-methodology

Identifiers

PMID38255033
PMCPMC10815713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.