Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38254983›Full record

ReviewGenes2024

Ling Liu, Yuxin Xie, Baba Salifu Yahaya, Fengkai Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ling LiuFaculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Engineering, Yibin University, Yibin 644000, China.
Yuxin XieMaize Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Baba Salifu YahayaMaize Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Fengkai WuMaize Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.ORCID 0009-0007-0861-5252

Funding

General Project of Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province 2022NSFSC0147National Natural Science Foundation of China 32101785the Sailing Project Plan of Yibin University 2021QH09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GIGANTEA (GI) is a conserved nuclear protein crucial for orchestrating the clock-associated feedback loop in the circadian system by integrating light input, modulating gating mechanisms, and regulating circadian clock resetting. It serves as a core component which transmits blue light signals for circadian rhythm resetting and overseeing floral initiation. Beyond circadian functions,

Indexed as

Abscisic AcidCircadian ClocksBlue LightBrassinosteroidsChlorophyllAbscisic AcidBrassinosteroidsChlorophyllcircadian clockflowering timeGIstimulus responsestress tolerance

Identifiers

PMID38254983
PMCPMC10815842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.