ReviewCancers2024
Artificial Intelligence Analysis Using MRI and PET Imaging in Gliomas: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- PET-based Radiomics Analysis for Predicting Prognosis and Differentiation Treatment-Related Changes in Glioma: A Systematic Review.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2026Article
- Multimodal artificial intelligence in glioma management: integrating neuroimaging and hematologic biomarkers for precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- A Narrative Review of Theranostics in Neuro-Oncology: Advancing Brain Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment Through Nuclear Medicine and Artificial Intelligence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Advances in multimodal imaging techniques in nanomedicine: enhancing drug delivery precision.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Multi-Modality Fusion and Tumor Sub-Component Relationship Ensemble Network for Brain Tumor Segmentation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Synergizing Deep Learning-Enabled Preprocessing and Human-AI Integration for Efficient Automatic Ground Truth Generation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The lack of early detection and a high rate of recurrence/progression after surgery are defined as the most common causes of a very poor prognosis of Gliomas. The developments of quantification systems with special regards to artificial intelligence (AI) on medical images (CT, MRI, PET) are under evaluation in the clinical and research context in view of several applications providing different information related to the reconstruction of imaging, the segmentation of tissues acquired, the selection of features, and the proper data analyses. Different approaches of AI have been proposed as the machine and deep learning, which utilize artificial neural networks inspired by neuronal architectures. In addition, new systems have been developed using AI techniques to offer suggestions or make decisions in medical diagnosis, emulating the judgment of radiologist experts. The potential clinical role of AI focuses on the prediction of disease progression in more aggressive forms in gliomas, differential diagnosis (pseudoprogression vs. proper progression), and the follow-up of aggressive gliomas. This narrative Review will focus on the available applications of AI in brain tumor diagnosis, mainly related to malignant gliomas, with particular attention to the postoperative application of MRI and PET imaging, considering the current state of technical approach and the evaluation after treatment (including surgery, radiotherapy/chemotherapy, and prognostic stratification).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.