ArticleCancers2024
Evaluation the Effect of Sonodynamic Therapy with 5-Aminolevulinic Acid and Sodium Fluorescein by Preclinical Animal Study.
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound-triggered platelet vehicles loading fluorescein for targeted sonodynamic therapy of glioblastoma.Drug delivery · 2026Article
- NIR-II conjugated polymers for tumor sonodynamic therapy.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Nanobiotechnology-driven advances in sonodynamic therapy: unlocking the potential of sonosensitizers in clinical translation.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Sonodynamic Therapy Using 5-Aminolevulinic Acid for Malignant Gliomas: A Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Pharmaceutical equivalent 5-aminolevulinic acid fluorescence guided resection of central nervous system tumors: feasibility, safeness and cost-benefit considerations.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024Article
- Microbubble-Enhanced Focused Ultrasound for Infiltrating Gliomas.Biomedicines · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sonodynamic therapy (SDT) is a novel tumor treatment that combines biosafe sonosensitizers and noninvasive focused ultrasound to eradicate solid tumors. Sonosensitizers such as 5-aminolevulinic acid and fluorescein have great potential in tumor treatment. Here, rodent subcutaneous and brain tumor models were used to evaluate the treatment effect of both 5-ALA- and fluorescein-mediated SDT. The subcutaneous tumor growth rates of both SDT groups were significantly inhibited compared with that of the control groups. For intracranial tumors, 5-ALA-SDT treatment significantly inhibited brain tumor growth, while fluorescein-SDT exerted no therapeutic effect in animals. The distribution of fluorescein in the brain tumor region underwent further assessment. Seven days post tumor implantation, experimental animals received fluorescein and were sacrificed for brain specimen collection. Analysis of the dissected brains revealed no fluorescence signals, indicating an absence of fluorescein accumulation in the early-stage glioma tissue. These data suggest that the fluorescein-SDT treatment response is closely related to the amount of accumulated fluorescein. This study reports the equivalent effects of 5-ALA and fluorescein on the treatment of somatic tumors. For orthotopic brain tumor models, tumor vascular permeability should be considered when choosing fluorescein as a sonosensitizer. In conclusion, both fluorescein and 5-ALA are safe and effective SDT sonosensitizers, and the tumor microenvironment and pathologic type should be considered in the selection of adequate sonosensitizers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.