Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38254703›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2024

Biomarkers in Peripartum Cardiomyopathy-What We Know and What Is Still to Be Found.

Karolina E Kryczka, Marcin Demkow, Zofia Dzielińska

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Multifaceted roles of neutrophils in cardiac disease.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2025
    Review
  10. Unraveling the mystery of peripartum cardiomyopathy; Cathepsin D.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. What Do We Know about Peripartum Cardiomyopathy? Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karolina E KryczkaDepartment of Coronary and Structural Heart Diseases, National Institute of Cardiology, 04-628 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6064-3548
Marcin DemkowDepartment of Coronary and Structural Heart Diseases, National Institute of Cardiology, 04-628 Warsaw, Poland.
Zofia DzielińskaDepartment of Coronary and Structural Heart Diseases, National Institute of Cardiology, 04-628 Warsaw, Poland.
Institute of Cardiology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a form of heart failure, often severe, that occurs in previously healthy women at the end of their pregnancy or in the first few months after delivery. In PPCM, the recovery of heart function reaches 45-50%. However, the all-cause mortality in long-term observation remains high, reaching 20% irrespective of recovery status. The incidence of PPCM is increasing globally; therefore, effort is required to clarify the pathophysiological background of the disease, as well as to discover specific diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. The etiology of the disease remains unclear, including oxidative stress; inflammation; hormonal disturbances; endothelial, microcirculatory, cardiomyocyte and extracellular matrix dysfunction; fibrosis; and genetic mutations. Currently, antiangiogenic 16-kDa prolactin (PRL), cleaved from standard 23-kDa PRL in the case of unbalanced oxidative stress, is recognized as the main trigger of the disease. In addition, 16-kDa PRL causes damage to cardiomyocytes, acting via microRNA-146a secreted from endothelial cells as a cause of the NF-κβ pathway. Bromocriptine, which inhibits the secretion of PRL from the pituitary gland, is now the only specific treatment for PPCM. Many different phenotypes of the disease, as well as cases of non-responders to bromocriptine treatment, indicate other pathophysiological pathways that need further investigation. Biomarkers in PPCM are not well established. There is a deficiency in specific diagnostic biomarkers. Pro-brain-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal BNP are the best, however unspecific, diagnostic biomarkers of heart failure at the moment. Therefore, more efforts should be engaged in investigating more specific biomolecules of a diagnostic and prognostic manner such as 16-kDa PRL, galectin-3, myeloperoxidase, or soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1/placental growth factor ratio. In this review, we present the current state of knowledge and future directions of exploring PPCM pathophysiology, including microRNA and heat shock proteins, which may improve diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and the development of specific treatment strategies, and consequently improve patients' prognosis and outcome.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathiesHeart FailureMicroRNAsBiomarkersBromocriptineEndothelial CellsFemaleHumansMicrocirculationPeripartum PeriodPlacenta Growth FactorPregnancyBiomarkersBromocriptineMicroRNAsPlacenta Growth Factor16-kDa PRLcardiac biomarkersfibrosisgalectin-3heart disease in pregnancyheart failureheat shock proteinHspmicroRNAmyeloperoxidaseperipartum cardiomyopathyprolactin

Identifiers

PMID38254703
PMCPMC10813209
OpenAlexW4390819046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.