Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38254644›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2023

Combining Low-Dose Computer-Tomography-Based Radiomics and Serum Metabolomics for Diagnosis of Malignant Nodules in Participants of Lung Cancer Screening Studies.

Joanna Zyla, Michal Marczyk, Wojciech Prazuch, Magdalena Sitkiewicz, Agata Durawa, Malgorzata Jelitto, Katarzyna Dziadziuszko, Karol Jelonek, Agata Kurczyk, Edyta Szurowska and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. MRI-based clinical radiomics nomogram for the prognostic prediction of adult diffuse low-grade gliomas.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Joanna ZylaDepartment of Data Science and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2895-7969
Michal MarczykDepartment of Data Science and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2508-5736
Wojciech PrazuchDepartment of Data Science and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.
Magdalena SitkiewiczDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.
Agata DurawaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.
Malgorzata Jelitto2nd Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.
Katarzyna Dziadziuszko2nd Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.
Karol JelonekCenter for Translational Research and Molecular Biology of Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7233-7695
Agata KurczykDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4124-9385
Edyta Szurowska2nd Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7042-4381
Witold RzymanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.
Piotr Widłak2nd Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5099-4726
Joanna PolanskaDepartment of Data Science and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8004-9864
Gdańsk Medical University · PLSilesian University of Technology · PLThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PL

Funding

National Science Center 2017/27/B/NZ7/01833Silesian University of Technology 02/070/BK_23/0043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiomics is an emerging approach to support the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules detected via low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening. Serum metabolome is a promising source of auxiliary biomarkers that could help enhance the precision of lung cancer diagnosis in CT-based screening. Thus, we aimed to verify whether the combination of these two techniques, which provides local/morphological and systemic/molecular features of disease at the same time, increases the performance of lung cancer classification models. The collected cohort consists of 1086 patients with radiomic and 246 patients with serum metabolomic evaluations. Different machine learning techniques, i.e., random forest and logistic regression were applied for each omics. Next, model predictions were combined with various integration methods to create a final model. The best single omics models were characterized by an AUC of 83% in radiomics and 60% in serum metabolomics. The model integration only slightly increased the performance of the combined model (AUC equal to 85%), which was not statistically significant. We concluded that radiomics itself has a good ability to discriminate lung cancer from benign lesions. However, additional research is needed to test whether its combination with other molecular assessments would further improve the diagnosis of screening-detected lung nodules.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsComputersHumansRadiomicsTomography, X-Ray Computedclassification modelsearly detectionintegrationlung cancerscreening study

Identifiers

PMID38254644
PMCPMC10813699
OpenAlexW4390338830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.