Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38254513›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Predicting Egg Storage Time with a Portable Near-Infrared Instrument: Effects of Temperature and Production System.

Daniel Cozzolino, Pooja Sanal, Jana Schreuder, Paul James Williams, Elham Assadi Soumeh, Milou Helene Dekkers, Molly Anderson, Sheree Boisen, Louwrens Christiaan Hoffman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel CozzolinoCentre for Nutrition and Food Sciences, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6247-8817
Pooja SanalSchool of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Jana SchreuderFood Science Department, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, Stellenbosch 7602, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5531-5857
Paul James WilliamsFood Science Department, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, Stellenbosch 7602, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-6014-2049
Elham Assadi SoumehSchool of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8635-3138
Milou Helene DekkersQueensland Animal Science Precinct (QASP), The University of Queensland, Gatton Campus, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Molly AndersonQueensland Animal Science Precinct (QASP), The University of Queensland, Gatton Campus, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Sheree BoisenQueensland Animal Science Precinct (QASP), The University of Queensland, Gatton Campus, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Louwrens Christiaan HoffmanCentre for Nutrition and Food Sciences, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2736-1933

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining egg freshness is critical for ensuring food safety and security and as such, different methods have been evaluated and implemented to accurately measure and predict it. In this study, a portable near-infrared (NIR) instrument combined with chemometrics was used to monitor and predict the storage time of eggs under two storage conditions-room temperature (RT) and cold (CT) storage-from two production systems: cage and free-range. A total of 700 egg samples were analyzed, using principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares (PLS) regression to analyze the NIR spectra. The PCA score plot did not show any clear separation between egg samples from the two production systems; however, some egg samples were grouped according to storage conditions. The cross-validation statistics for predicting storage time were as follows: for cage and RT eggs, the coefficient of determination in cross validation (R

Indexed as

cagechemometricsegg freshnessfree rangenear-infrared spectroscopystorage time

Identifiers

PMID38254513
PMCPMC10814904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.