Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38254173›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2024

To leave no one behind: Assessing utilization of maternal newborn and child health services by all the 13 particularly vulnerable tribal groups (PVTGs) of Odisha, India.

Jyoti Ghosal, Madhusmita Bal, Arundhuti Das, Bhuputra Panda, Manoranjan Ranjit, Manas Ranjan Behera, Sonali Kar, Sudhir Kumar Satpathy, Ambarish Dutta, Sanghamitra Pati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jyoti GhosalSchool of Public Health, KIIT Deemed to Be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Madhusmita BalICMR-Regional Medical Research Center, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Arundhuti DasICMR-Regional Medical Research Center, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Bhuputra PandaSchool of Public Health, KIIT Deemed to Be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Manoranjan RanjitICMR-Regional Medical Research Center, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Manas Ranjan BeheraSchool of Public Health, KIIT Deemed to Be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Sonali KarKalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, KIIT Deemed to Be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Sudhir Kumar SatpathySchool of Public Health, KIIT Deemed to Be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Ambarish DuttaIndian Institute of Public Health, Public Health foundation of India, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. ambarish.dutta@iiphb.org.
Sanghamitra PatiICMR-Regional Medical Research Center, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. drsanghamitra12@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7717-5592

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndigenous tribal people experience lower coverage of maternal, newborn and child healthcare (MNCH) services worldwide, including in India. Meanwhile, Indian tribal people comprise a special sub-population who are even more isolated, marginalized and underserved, designated as particularly vulnerable tribal groups (PVTGs). However, there is an extreme paucity of evidence on how this most vulnerable sub-population utilizes health services. Therefore, we aimed to estimate MNCH service utilization by all the 13 PVTGs of the eastern Indian state of Odisha and compare that with state and national rates.

methodsA total of 1186 eligible mothers who gave birth to a live child in last 5 years, were interviewed using a validated questionnaire. The weighted MNCH service utilization rates were estimated for antenatal care (ANC), intranatal care (INC), postnatal care (PNC) and immunization (for 12-23-month-old children). The same rates were estimated for state (n = 7144) and nationally representative samples (n = 176 843) from National Family Health Survey-5.

resultsThe ANC service utilization among PVTGs were considerably higher than national average except for early pregnancy registration (PVTGs 67% versus national 79.9%), and 5 ANC components (80.8% versus 82.3%). However, their institutional delivery rates (77.9%) were lower than averages for Odisha (93.1%) and India (90.1%). The PNC and immunization rates were substantially higher than the national averages. Furthermore, the main reasons behind greater home delivery in the PVTGs were accessibility issues (29.9%) and cultural barriers (23.1%).

conclusionOurs was the first study of MNCH service utilization by PVTGs of an Indian state. It is very pleasantly surprising to note that the most vulnerable subpopulation of India, the PVTGs, have achieved comparable or often greater utilization rates than the national average, which may be attributable to overall significantly better performance by the Odisha state. However, PVTGs have underperformed in terms of timely pregnancy registration and institutional delivery, which should be urgently addressed.

Indexed as

Child Health ServicesChildChild, PreschoolFamily HealthFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornMothersPregnancyChild healthIndiaMaternal healthNewborn healthOdishaParticularly vulnerable tribal groupsPVTGsUtilization

Identifiers

PMID38254173
PMCPMC10802067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.