Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38254095›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2024

Stakeholder perspectives of family interventions for schizophrenia in Indonesia: a qualitative study.

Herni Susanti, Helen Brooks, Budi-Anna Keliat, Tim Bradshaw, Dewi Wulandari, Rizky Fadilah, Raphita Diorarta, Suherman, Penny Bee, Karina Lovell and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Emergency Psychiatric Care in Primary Healthcare in Indonesia.International journal of community based nursing and midwifery · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Herni SusantiFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Kota Depok, Indonesia.
Helen BrooksDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Budi-Anna KeliatFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Kota Depok, Indonesia.
Tim BradshawDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Dewi WulandariFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Kota Depok, Indonesia.
Rizky FadilahFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Kota Depok, Indonesia.
Raphita DiorartaFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Kota Depok, Indonesia.
SuhermanFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Kota Depok, Indonesia.
Penny BeeDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Karina LovellDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Laoise RenwickDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. laoise.renwick@manchester.ac.uk.
University of Indonesia · IDUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T003987/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental illnesses comprise the single largest source of health-related economic burden globally and low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) are disproportionately affected. Many individuals with schizophrenia do not receive evidence-based, psychosocial interventions as these are largely unavailable, undeveloped, and under-researched in LMICs. Involving service-users and carers in the design of interventions is crucial to ensure stakeholder needs are adequately addressed by the intervention and to aid successful implementation. We aimed to explore the views and perspectives of different stakeholder groups about the delivery, format, and content of family interventions for people living with schizophrenia in Indonesia as a first step towards developing evidence-based, acceptable family interventions. This study used a qualitative design comprising single stakeholder focus groups. Data were analysed separately using the framework approach incorporating deductive and inductive coding within an existing heuristic framework. 51 participants consented to take part in this study comprising six stakeholder consultation groups including service-users (n = 15), caregivers (n = 15) and healthcare professionals (n = 21). Service users were diagnosed with schizophrenia. Caregivers comprised parents (n = 10, 67%), brothers (n = 2, 13%), sister (n = 1, 7%) and husbands (n = 2, 13%). Healthcare professionals were working as nurses (n = 6, 29%), doctors (n = 5, 23%) or cadre's (n = 10, 48%). Caregiver and service-user respondents had limited knowledge or experience of structured family interventions. There was strong support for such interventions, however, for effective delivery a number of challenges exist in terms of widespread stigmatised views, low expectations for involvement in sharing decisions about care and treatment, views that healthcare professionals are expert and have the authority to delegate tasks to families such as responsibility for ensuring medication adherence and understanding the need to balance the needs of both service-users and families when there are conflicting agendas for treatment. These findings can support the development of evidence-based family interventions for families of those with schizophrenia in Indonesia, as user-informed interventions enhance engagement, satisfaction, and adherence to family interventions.

Indexed as

SchizophreniaFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansIndonesiaMaleQualitative ResearchFamily interventionsGlobal mental healthSchizophreniaStakeholder views

Identifiers

PMID38254095
PMCPMC10804701
OpenAlexW4391101566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.