Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38254022›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2024

Understanding facilitators of research participation among adults with self-reported chronic pain - a survey examining hypothetical research participation.

Charles Start, Meagan McBride, Guohao Zhu, Sana Shaikh, Jennifer Pierce

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charles StartDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Back & Pain Center, 325 E. Eisenhower Parkway, Burlington Building 1, Suite 310, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA.
Meagan McBrideDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Back & Pain Center, 325 E. Eisenhower Parkway, Burlington Building 1, Suite 310, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA.
Guohao ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Back & Pain Center, 325 E. Eisenhower Parkway, Burlington Building 1, Suite 310, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA.
Sana ShaikhDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Back & Pain Center, 325 E. Eisenhower Parkway, Burlington Building 1, Suite 310, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA.
Jennifer PierceDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Back & Pain Center, 325 E. Eisenhower Parkway, Burlington Building 1, Suite 310, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA. jmboik@med.umich.edu.
University of Michigan · USMichigan Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn inability to successfully recruit participants into clinical research has consequences that negatively affect the conduct and reliability of research studies. Understanding facilitators of research participation, namely motives for participation and preferred research outcomes, may improve recruitment and retention of clinical trials related to chronic pain. The present study explored research participation facilitators among individuals with chronic pain and their association with demographic characteristics, pain-related characteristics, and factors related to future research engagement.

methodsIndividuals from Michigan who were 18 years or older and self-reported having chronic pain completed an online survey assessing motives for research participation and desired research outcomes. Analyses were conducted in three stages. First, we evaluated underlying factors of motives for participation and research outcome preferences using principal components analysis. Second, we classified individuals according to their patterns of facilitators using latent profile analysis. Finally, we evaluated differences between facilitator profiles in demographic characteristics, pain-related characteristics, and factors related to future research engagement using χ

resultsThree components of motives for research participation were identified: social engagement/enjoyment; pain improvement/advancing science; and compensation. Three components of research outcome preferences were identified: co-occurring symptom reduction; behavior reduction modification; and pain and function improvement. Four potential patient-centered profiles utilizing these dimensions of facilitators were identified that had unique demographic characteristics, research participation willingness, and treatment interest.

conclusionsOur data provide a framework of motives and research outcome preferences that may inform recruitment and retention in chronic pain research. It also gives an indication of who may respond best to active or passive recruitment strategies that appeal to a given motive or preferred outcome. This information may be useful for improving recruitment and to monitor any potential biases in participant samples.

Indexed as

Chronic PainAdultBehavior TherapyHumansMotivationReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportChronic painMotives for research participationParticipant preferenceResearch participationStudy recruitment

Identifiers

PMID38254022
PMCPMC10802039
OpenAlexW4391103923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.