Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38254016›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2024

Evaluation of psychological distress, burnout and structural empowerment status of healthcare workers during the outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study.

Sara Taleb, Amir Vahedian-Azimi, Leila Karimi, Safa Salim, Farhan Mohammad, Dana Samhadaneh, Kalpana Singh, Nur-Run Hussein, Ali Ait Hssain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sara TalebDivision of Genomics and Translational Biomedicine, College of Health and Life Science, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0003-1795-0064
Amir Vahedian-AzimiTrauma Research Center, Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1678-7608
Leila KarimiBehavioral Sciences Research Center, Life Style Institute, Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1737-7782
Safa SalimDivision of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, College of Health & Life Sciences, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0001-7300-0915
Farhan MohammadDivision of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, College of Health & Life Sciences, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-2465-1508
Dana SamhadanehMcGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5848-7531
Kalpana SinghNursing Midwifery Research Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-2273-5062
Nur-Run HusseinKPJ Damansara Specialist Hospital, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-7284-8815
Ali Ait HssainMedical Intensive Care Unit, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar. a_aithssain@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7764-5793

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn light of several recent studies, there is evidence that the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused various mental health concerns in the general population, as well as among healthcare workers (HCWs). The main aim of this study was to assess the psychological distress, burnout and structural empowerment status of HCWs during the COVID-19 outbreak, and to evaluate its predictors.

methodsThis multi-center, cross-sectional web-based questionnaire survey was conducted on HCWs during the outbreak of COVID-19 from August 2020 to January 2021. HCWs working in hospitals from 48 different countries were invited to participate in an online anonymous survey that investigated sociodemographic data, psychological distress, burnout and structural empowerment (SE) based on Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21), Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and Conditions for work effectiveness questionnaire (CWEQ_II), respectively. Predictors of the total scores of DASS-21, MBI and CWEQ-II were assessed using unadjusted and adjusted binary logistic regression analysis.

resultsOut of the 1030 HCWs enrolled in this survey, all completed the sociodemographic section (response rate 100%) A total of 730 (70.9%) HCWs completed the DASS-21 questionnaire, 852 (82.6%) completed the MBI questionnaire, and 712 (69.1%) completed the CWEQ-II questionnaire. The results indicate that 360 out of 730 responders (49.3%) reported severe or extremely severe levels of stress, anxiety, and depression. Additionally, 422 out of 851 responders (49.6%) reported a high level of burnout, while 268 out of 712 responders (37.6%) reported a high level of structural empowerment based on the DASS-21, MBI, and CWEQ-II scales, respectively. In addition, the analysis showed that HCWs working in the COVID-19 areas experienced significantly higher symptoms of severe stress, anxiety, depression and higher levels of burnout compared to those working in other areas. The results also revealed that direct work with COVID-19 patients, lower work experience, and high workload during the outbreak of COVID-19 increase the risks of negative psychological consequences.

conclusionHealth professionals had high levels of burnout and psychological symptoms during the COVID-19 emergency. Monitoring and timely treatment of these conditions is needed.

Indexed as

COVID-19Psychological DistressPsychological TestsBurnout, PsychologicalCross-Sectional StudiesDisease OutbreaksHealth PersonnelHumansSelf ReportAnxietyBurnoutCOVID-19DepressionPredictorsStressStructural empowerment

Identifiers

PMID38254016
PMCPMC10804486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.