ArticleBMC public health2024
Comparison of the perinatal outcomes of expected high ovarian response patients and normal ovarian response patients undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer in natural/small amount of HMG induced ovulation cycles.
Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDue to the high risk of complications in fresh transfer cycles among expected high ovarian response patients, most choose frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET). There are currently few researches on whether the FET outcomes of expected high ovarian response patients with regular menstrual cycles are similar to those of normal ovarian response. Therefore, our objective was to explore and compare pregnancy outcomes and maternal and neonatal outcomes of natural FET cycles between patients with expected high ovarian response and normal ovarian response with regular menstrual cycles based on the antral follicle count (AFC).
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 5082 women undergoing natural or small amount of HMG induced ovulation FET cycles at the Reproductive Center of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 1, 2017, to March 31, 2021. The population was divided into expected high ovarian response group and normal ovarian response group based on the AFC, and the differences in patient characteristics, clinical outcomes and perinatal outcomes between the two groups were compared.
resultsRegarding clinical outcomes, compared with the normal ovarian response group, patients in the expected high ovarian response group had a higher clinical pregnancy rate (57.34% vs. 48.50%) and live birth rate (48.12% vs. 38.97%). There was no difference in the early miscarriage rate or twin pregnancy rate between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that the clinical pregnancy rate (adjusted OR 1.190) and live birth rate (adjusted OR 1.171) of the expected high ovarian response group were higher than those of the normal ovarian response group. In terms of maternal and infant outcomes, the incidence of very preterm delivery in the normal ovarian response group was higher than that in the expected high ovarian response group (0.86% vs. 0.16%, adjusted OR 0.131), Other maternal and infant outcomes were not significantly different. After grouping by age (< 30 y, 30-34 y, 35-39 y), there was no difference in the incidence of very preterm delivery among the age subgroups.
conclusionFor patients with expected high ovarian response and regular menstrual cycles undergoing natural or small amount of HMG induced ovulation FET cycles, the clinical and perinatal outcomes are reassuring. For patients undergoing natural or small amount of HMG induced ovulation FET cycles, as age increases, perinatal care should be strengthened during pregnancy to reduce the incidence of very preterm delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.