Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38253989›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2024

Generative AI in glioma: Ensuring diversity in training image phenotypes to improve diagnostic performance for IDH mutation prediction.

Hye Hyeon Moon, Jiheon Jeong, Ji Eun Park, Namkug Kim, Changyong Choi, Young-Hoon Kim, Sang Woo Song, Chang-Ki Hong, Jeong Hoon Kim, Ho Sung Kim

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Mitigating Data Scarcity in the Classification of Glioma Molecular Subtypes: The Power of Generative Imaging.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025
    Article
  14. IDH mutant high-grade gliomas.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hye Hyeon MoonDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8484-3117
Jiheon JeongDepartment of Convergence Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8238-6642
Ji Eun ParkDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4419-4682
Namkug KimDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3438-2217
Changyong ChoiDepartment of Convergence Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Young-Hoon KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8852-6503
Sang Woo SongDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5523-3798
Chang-Ki HongDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2761-0373
Jeong Hoon KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7131-4523
Ho Sung KimDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9477-7421
Ulsan College · KR

Funding

Korean government RS-2023-00208227Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea HI21C1161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study evaluated whether generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based augmentation (GAA) can provide diverse and realistic imaging phenotypes and improve deep learning-based classification of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) type in glioma compared with neuroradiologists.

methodsFor model development, 565 patients (346 IDH-wildtype, 219 IDH-mutant) with paired contrast-enhanced T1 and FLAIR MRI scans were collected from tertiary hospitals and The Cancer Imaging Archive. Performance was tested on internal (119, 78 IDH-wildtype, 41 IDH-mutant [IDH1 and 2]) and external test sets (108, 72 IDH-wildtype, 36 IDH-mutant). GAA was developed using a score-based diffusion model and ResNet50 classifier. The optimal GAA was selected in comparison with the null model. Two neuroradiologists (R1, R2) assessed realism, diversity of imaging phenotypes, and predicted IDH mutation. The performance of a classifier trained with optimal GAA was compared with that of neuroradiologists using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). The effect of tumor size and contrast enhancement on GAA performance was tested.

resultsGenerated images demonstrated realism (Turing's test: 47.5-50.5%) and diversity indicating IDH type. Optimal GAA was achieved with augmentation with 110 000 generated slices (AUC: 0.938). The classifier trained with optimal GAA demonstrated significantly higher AUC values than neuroradiologists in both the internal (R1, P = .003; R2, P < .001) and external test sets (R1, P < .01; R2, P < .001). GAA with large-sized tumors or predominant enhancement showed comparable performance to optimal GAA (internal test: AUC 0.956 and 0.922; external test: 0.810 and 0.749).

conclusionsThe application of generative AI with realistic and diverse images provided better diagnostic performance than neuroradiologists for predicting IDH type in glioma.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBrain NeoplasmsGliomaIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMagnetic Resonance ImagingMutationAdultAgedDeep LearningFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypePrognosisIDH1 protein, humanIDH2 protein, humanIsocitrate DehydrogenaseArtificial Intelligencegene expression profilinggliomaisocitrate dehydrogenasemagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID38253989
PMCPMC11145451
OpenAlexW4391144647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.