Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38253960›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of hematology2024

Differences between Japanese new criteria and pregnancy-specific modified ISTH DIC scores for obstetrical DIC diagnosis.

Mamoru Morikawa, Akio Kamiya, Aya Yoshida, Shuhei Nishibata, Hidetaka Okada

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mamoru MorikawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kansai Medical University, Shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan. mmamoru@hirakata.kmu.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9816-5422
Akio KamiyaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kansai Medical University, Shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Aya YoshidaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kansai Medical University, Shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Shuhei NishibataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kansai Medical University, Shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Hidetaka OkadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kansai Medical University, Shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Kansai Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The new Japanese diagnostic criteria for obstetrical disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) (tentative version) were released in June 2022. We aimed to demonstrate the differences in characteristics between women with DIC diagnosed using the new Japanese criteria and those diagnosed using the pregnancy-specific modified International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis DIC score, also known as the pregnancy-specific modified ISTH DIC score, which was released in 2014. In this retrospective cohort study, all participants were retrospectively diagnosed based on both criteria. Six women were diagnosed with obstetrical DIC based on both criteria (Group A). Of the 43 women diagnosed with obstetrical DIC based on the worldwide criteria, 36 were diagnosed with non-obstetrical DIC based on the new Japanese criteria (Group B). Group A had significantly lower fibrinogen levels and significantly higher prothrombin time differences and scores of underlying diseases (particularly postpartum hemorrhage with coagulopathy) and laboratory findings than Group B. Additionally, Group A had significantly higher rates of platelet concentrate (PC) transfusion therapy for obstetrical DIC and more transfusions of fresh frozen plasma and/or cryoprecipitate, red blood cells and PC than Group B. Thus, the new Japanese criteria detected more severe cases of obstetrical DIC compared with the worldwide criteria.

Indexed as

Disseminated Intravascular CoagulationThrombosisFemaleHemostasisHumansJapanPregnancyRetrospective StudiesDiagnostic criteriaLaboratory findingsObstetrical disseminated intravascular coagulationUnderlying diseases

Identifiers

PMID38253960
OpenAlexW4391116014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.