ArticleInternational journal of hematology2024
Differences between Japanese new criteria and pregnancy-specific modified ISTH DIC scores for obstetrical DIC diagnosis.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multicenter Retrospective Evaluation of the Chinese Expert Consensus Scoring System for the Diagnosis of Obstetrical DIC.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2025Article
- Effectiveness, reliability, and validity of new Japanese diagnostic criteria for obstetrical disseminated intravascular coagulation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The new Japanese diagnostic criteria for obstetrical disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) (tentative version) were released in June 2022. We aimed to demonstrate the differences in characteristics between women with DIC diagnosed using the new Japanese criteria and those diagnosed using the pregnancy-specific modified International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis DIC score, also known as the pregnancy-specific modified ISTH DIC score, which was released in 2014. In this retrospective cohort study, all participants were retrospectively diagnosed based on both criteria. Six women were diagnosed with obstetrical DIC based on both criteria (Group A). Of the 43 women diagnosed with obstetrical DIC based on the worldwide criteria, 36 were diagnosed with non-obstetrical DIC based on the new Japanese criteria (Group B). Group A had significantly lower fibrinogen levels and significantly higher prothrombin time differences and scores of underlying diseases (particularly postpartum hemorrhage with coagulopathy) and laboratory findings than Group B. Additionally, Group A had significantly higher rates of platelet concentrate (PC) transfusion therapy for obstetrical DIC and more transfusions of fresh frozen plasma and/or cryoprecipitate, red blood cells and PC than Group B. Thus, the new Japanese criteria detected more severe cases of obstetrical DIC compared with the worldwide criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.