ArticleLasers in medical science2024
Evaluation of chlorophyll-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles for photodynamic therapy on cancer cell lines.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery Systems: Recent Advances in Biomedical Applications, Wound Healing and Therapeutic Perspectives.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Chlorophyll-Loaded Castor Oil Nanoemulsions Exhibit Photodynamic Therapy Efficacy Against B16-F10 Melanoma with Low Cytotoxicity Toward HaCaT Keratinocytes.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Functional xanthan gum-based ZnO nanocomposite for antimicrobial applications: synthesis, properties, and performance evaluation.BMC chemistry · 2026Article
- Clinicopathological and prognostic insights into Embryonal Tumors with Multilayered Rosettes (ETMRs).Diagnostic pathology · 2026Article
- Photodynamic therapy for oral mucosal lesions: photosensitizer evolution, pharmacological mechanisms, and clinical translation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- "Exosomal blueprint of lung-tropic metastasis: molecular signatures, microenvironmental conditioning, and translational implications in cancer".Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Clinicopathological insights and management of liver metastases: Current advances and future perspectives.World journal of hepatology · 2025Review
- Review
- 4D-printed microdevices for spatiotemporal detection of ctDNA and miRNA in pancreatic cancer: an in-depth review.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Diagnostic and clinical challenges of primary pulmonary solid adenocarcinoma with signet-ring cell features: a case report with unusual presentation and literature review.International cancer conference journal · 2025Article
- Targeted editing of CCL5 with CRISPR-Cas9 nanoparticles enhances breast cancer immunotherapy.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2025Article
- Small Biological Fighters Against Cancer: Viruses, Bacteria, Archaea, Fungi, Protozoa, and Microalgae.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Advancements in Nanocarrier Delivery Systems for Photodynamic Therapy in Lung Cancer.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Adhesin Antibody-Grafted Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Suppress Immune Escape for Treatment of Fungal Systemic Infection.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chlorophyll (Chl) is a promising natural photosensitizer (PS) in photodynamic treatment (PDT). Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) were chosen to increase the effectiveness of PDT. This study aimed to evaluate the synergistic efficacy of chlorophyll-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles (Chl-MSNs) with photodynamic therapy (PDT) and to investigate their potential toxicity in HepG2, MDA-MB-231, and HSF cell lines. Chl-MSNs were prepared via the physical adsorption method. TEM, DLS, and zeta potential examined morphology, size, and surface characteristics. MSNs and Chl-MSNs were characterized using the same techniques. HPLC was used to assess the encapsulation efficiency. At pH 7.4, an in vitro release experiment of Chl-MSNs was performed. Chl, MSNs, and Chl-MSNs were applied to the three cell lines at different concentrations and subjected to red (650 nm) and blue (450-500 nm) lasers. MSNs and Chl-MSNs' sizes were 90.338 ± 38.49 nm and 123.84 ± 15.67 nm, respectively, as obtained by TEM; the hydrodynamic diameter for MSNs (93.69 ± 20.53 nm) and Chl-MSNs (212.95 ± 19.76 nm); and their zeta potential values are - 16.7 ± 2.19 mV and - 18.84 ± 1.40 mV. The encapsulation efficiency of Chl-MSNs was 70%. Chl-MSNs displayed no toxicity in dark conditions but showed excellent photostability under blue and red light exposure. Furthermore, using Chl over Chl-MSNs has a higher PDT efficiency than the tested cell lines. Chl-MSNs have the potential to be an effective delivery system. PDT proved to be an essential technique for cancer treatment. Blue laser is recommended over red laser with Chl and MSNs for destroying cancer cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.