Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38253873›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Research on surface defect detection algorithm of pipeline weld based on YOLOv7.

Xiangqian Xu, Xing Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiangqian XuSchool of Material Science and Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, No. 18, East Section of Electronic Second Road, Xi'an, 710065, Shaanxi, China. xqxu@xsyu.edu.cn.
Xing LiSchool of Material Science and Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, No. 18, East Section of Electronic Second Road, Xi'an, 710065, Shaanxi, China.
Xi'an Shiyou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aiming at the problems of low target detection accuracy and high leakage rate of the current traditional weld surface defect detection methods and existing detection models, an improved YOLOv7 pipeline weld surface defect detection model is proposed to improve detection results. In the improved model, a Le-HorBlock module is designed, and it is introduced into the back of fourth CBS module of the backbone network, which preserves the characteristics of high-order information by realizing second-order spatial interaction, thus enhancing the ability of the network to extract features in weld defect images. The coordinate attention (CoordAtt) block is introduced to enhance the representation ability of target features, suppress interference. The CIoU loss function in YOLOv7 network model is replaced by the SIoU, so as to optimize the loss function, reduce the freedom of the loss function, and accelerate convergence. And a new large-scale pipeline weld surface defect dataset containing 2000 images of pipeline welds with weld defects is used in the proposed model. In the experimental comparison, the improved YOLOv7 network model has greatly improved the missed detection rate compared with the original network. The experimental results show that the improved YOLOv7 network model mAP@80.5 can reach 78.6%, which is 15.9% higher than the original model, and the detection effect is better than the original network and other classical target detection networks.

Identifiers

PMID38253873
PMCPMC10810364
OpenAlexW4391103873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.