Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38253831›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2024

Impact of a nanofiltration system on microplastic contamination in Geneva groundwater (Switzerland).

Angel Negrete Velasco, Alicia Ellero, Stéphan Ramseier Gentile, Stéphane Zimmermann, Pascal Ramaciotti, Serge Stoll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Angel Negrete VelascoDepartment F.-A. Forel for Environmental and Aquatic Sciences, Faculty of Science, Group of Environmental Physical Chemistry, University of Geneva, 66, Boulevard Carl-Vogt, CH-1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland. angel.negretevelasco@unige.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5823-6161
Alicia ElleroSIG, Industrial Boards of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Stéphan Ramseier GentileSIG, Industrial Boards of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Stéphane ZimmermannSIG, Industrial Boards of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Pascal RamaciottiSIG, Industrial Boards of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Serge StollDepartment F.-A. Forel for Environmental and Aquatic Sciences, Faculty of Science, Group of Environmental Physical Chemistry, University of Geneva, 66, Boulevard Carl-Vogt, CH-1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3158-4208

Funding

FOWA-SVGW FOWA/SIG-026-19Services Industriels de Genève FOWA/SIG-026-19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microplastics (MPs) have been observed in the oceans, fresh waters, karstic water and remote water bodies. However, little is known on groundwater contamination, which is a natural resource of utmost importance for millions of people and is often perceived as a reliable source of water. Moreover, nanofiltration is perceived as a reliable technology to remove contaminants from water. In this study, large sample volumes of a silty-sandy gravel aquifer and the corresponding nanofiltered water were analysed for the presence of MPs (> 20 µm) using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) microscopy. Concentration in ground water was 8 ± 7 MPs/m

Indexed as

GroundwaterPolyvinylsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringFerretsHumansMicroplasticsPlasticsPolyethylenePolymersSwitzerlandWaterethylenevinylacetate copolymerMicroplasticsPlasticsPolyethylenePolymersPolyvinylsWaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalFibresGroundwaterInfrared microscopyMicroplasticsNanofiltrationSuspended particulate matter

Identifiers

PMID38253831
PMCPMC10881595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.