Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38253828›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2024

Adsorption of contaminants by nanomaterials synthesized by green and conventional routes: a critical review.

Natália Gabriele Camparotto, Tauany de Figueiredo Neves, Josiane de Souza Vendemiatti, Bruna Toledo Dos Santos, Melissa Gurgel Adeodato Vieira, Patrícia Prediger

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natália Gabriele CamparottoSchool of Technology, University of Campinas - Unicamp, Limeira , São Paulo, CEP: 13484-332, Brazil.
Tauany de Figueiredo NevesSchool of Technology, University of Campinas - Unicamp, Limeira , São Paulo, CEP: 13484-332, Brazil.
Josiane de Souza VendemiattiSchool of Technology, University of Campinas - Unicamp, Limeira , São Paulo, CEP: 13484-332, Brazil.
Bruna Toledo Dos SantosSchool of Technology, University of Campinas - Unicamp, Limeira , São Paulo, CEP: 13484-332, Brazil.
Melissa Gurgel Adeodato VieiraSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Albert Einstein Avenue, 500, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-852, Brazil.
Patrícia PredigerSchool of Technology, University of Campinas - Unicamp, Limeira , São Paulo, CEP: 13484-332, Brazil. prediger@unicamp.br.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 308046/2016-6Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 311419/2022-4Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2019/25228-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2020/16004-9Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2022/14834-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2023/02041-8Fundo de Apoio ao Ensino, à Pesquisa e Extensão, Universidade Estadual de Campinas 2207/23Fundo de Apoio ao Ensino, à Pesquisa e Extensão, Universidade Estadual de Campinas 2529/23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanomaterials, due to their large surface area and selectivity, have stood out as an alternative for the adsorption of contaminants from water and effluents. Synthesized from green or traditional protocols, the main advantages and disadvantages of green nanomaterials are the elimination of the use of toxic chemicals and difficulty of reproducing the preparation of nanomaterials, respectively, while traditional nanomaterials have the main advantage of being able to prepare nanomaterials with well-defined morphological properties and the disadvantage of using potentially toxic chemicals. Thus, based on the particularities of green and conventional nanomaterials, this review aims to fill a gap in the literature on the comparison of the synthesis, morphology, and application of these nanomaterials in the adsorption of contaminants in water. Focusing on the adsorption of heavy metals, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, dyes, polyaromatic hydrocarbons, and phenol derivatives in water, for the first time, a review article explored and compared how chemical and morphological changes in nanoadsorbents synthesized by green and conventional protocols affect performance in the adsorption of contaminants in water. Despite advances in the area, there is still a lack of review articles on the topic.

Indexed as

Metals, HeavyNanostructuresWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater PurificationAdsorptionWaterMetals, HeavyWaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalAdsorptionContaminant removalGreen synthesisNanomaterials

Identifiers

PMID38253828
OpenAlexW4391115718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.