ArticleEnvironmental entomology2024
Effect of microclimatic temperatures on the development period of 3 rice planthopper species (Hemiptera: Delphacidae): a phenology model based on field observations.
Article in Environmental entomology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel method for detecting brown planthopper (Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Most pest phenology models are temperature dependent. Generally, the air temperature at reference height is used to predict pest development, but the air temperature varies between inside and outside the crop canopy, where pests reside. Here, we sampled 3 rice planthopper species-Nilaparvata lugens (Stål), Sogatella furcifera (Horváth), and Laodelphax striatellus (Fallén)-and micrometeorological observations in paddy fields to analyze how thermal environments inside the canopy affect pest development. Seasonal variations in the population density of these species were surveyed in 3 experimental fields with 2 water temperature plots (normal and low-water temperature plots). The development periods of the 3 species were predicted individually based on pest phenology models using temperatures recorded at 6 heights (0.0-2.0 m). We calculated the root mean square error (RMSE) values from the predicted and observed development periods for each rice planthopper. The development prediction using the temperature inside the canopy was more accurate than that utilizing the temperature at the reference height (2.0 m). In the low-water temperature plot, the RMSE value for N. lugens, S. furcifera, and L. striatellus was 6.4, 5.6, and 4.1 when using the temperature at the reference height (2.0 m), respectively, and 2.8, 3.8, and 2.9 when employing the temperature inside the canopy at 0.25 m, respectively. The development prediction utilizing the air temperature at the bottom (0.25 m) of canopy, where N. lugens resides, was most effective for N. lugens among the 3 species. These findings suggest the importance of utilizing microhabitat-based temperatures to predict pest development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.