Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38253803›Full record

ArticleNature cancer2024

The Molecular Twin artificial-intelligence platform integrates multi-omic data to predict outcomes for pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients.

Arsen Osipov, Ognjen Nikolic, Arkadiusz Gertych, Sarah Parker, Andrew Hendifar, Pranav Singh, Darya Filippova, Grant Dagliyan, Cristina R Ferrone, Lei Zheng and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Multi-modal learning with incomplete data.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Strategy for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Arsen Osipov *Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ognjen Nikolic *Betteromics, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Arkadiusz Gertych *Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3107-602X
Sarah ParkerSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Andrew HendifarDepartment of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Pranav SinghBetteromics, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Darya FilippovaBetteromics, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Grant DagliyanSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Cristina R FerroneSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Lei ZhengDepartment of Oncology, Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jason H MooreSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Warren TourtellotteSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jennifer E Van EykSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9050-148X
Dan TheodorescuSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. dan.theodorescu@cshs.org.ORCID 0000-0002-8708-8206

Funding

Targeting the Stroma for Pancreatic Cancer TreatmentK08CA259456 · NCI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI OSIPOV, ARSEN · 2021 to 2025
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA259456NCI NIH HHS L30 CA284423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contemporary analyses focused on a limited number of clinical and molecular biomarkers have been unable to accurately predict clinical outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Here we describe a precision medicine platform known as the Molecular Twin consisting of advanced machine-learning models and use it to analyze a dataset of 6,363 clinical and multi-omic molecular features from patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to accurately predict disease survival (DS). We show that a full multi-omic model predicts DS with the highest accuracy and that plasma protein is the top single-omic predictor of DS. A parsimonious model learning only 589 multi-omic features demonstrated similar predictive performance as the full multi-omic model. Our platform enables discovery of parsimonious biomarker panels and performance assessment of outcome prediction models learning from resource-intensive panels. This approach has considerable potential to impact clinical care and democratize precision cancer medicine worldwide.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansIntelligenceMultiomics

Identifiers

PMID38253803
PMCPMC10899109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.