Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38253798›Full record

Observational studyNature medicine2024

Prospective prenatal cell-free DNA screening for genetic conditions of heterogenous etiologies.

Jinglan Zhang, Yanting Wu, Songchang Chen, Qiong Luo, Hui Xi, Jianli Li, Xiaomei Qin, Ying Peng, Na Ma, Bingxin Yang and 20 more

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Nature medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
53.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Clinical spectrum and treatment responses in.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Cell-Free DNA-Based Theranostics for Inflammatory Disorders.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  12. Discovery and validation of GNA12Frontiers in neurology · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Jinglan Zhang *Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. jinglanzhang@foxmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4600-7123
Yanting Wu *Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2293-1792
Songchang Chen *Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qiong Luo *Key Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Hui Xi *National Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Birth Defect for Research and Prevention, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, China.
Jianli LiBeijing BioBiggen Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Xiaomei QinBeijing BioBiggen Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Ying PengNational Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Birth Defect for Research and Prevention, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, China.
Na MaNational Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Birth Defect for Research and Prevention, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, China.
Bingxin YangInternational Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Xiang QiuObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Weiliang LuObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yuan ChenKey Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Ying JiangKey Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Panpan ChenKey Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yifeng LiuKey Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4029-5328
Chen ZhangObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhiwei ZhangBeijing BioBiggen Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Yu XiongObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jie ShenObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Huan LiangObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yunyun RenObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chunmei YingObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Minyue DongKey Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaotian LiObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Congjian XuObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hua WangNational Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Birth Defect for Research and Prevention, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, China. wanghua213@aliyun.com.
Dan ZhangKey Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China. zhangdan@zju.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-1295-4795
Chenming XuObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. chenming_xu2006@163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0433-8909
Hefeng HuangObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. huanghefg@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4344-8019
Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University · CNWomen's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University · CNHunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CNBeijing Biocytogen (China) · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNMinistry of Education · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening uses extracellular fetal DNA circulating in the peripheral blood of pregnant women to detect prevalent fetal chromosomal anomalies. However, numerous severe conditions with underlying single-gene defects are not included in current prenatal cfDNA screening. In this prospective, multicenter and observational study, pregnant women at elevated risk for fetal genetic conditions were enrolled for a cfDNA screening test based on coordinative allele-aware target enrichment sequencing. This test encompasses the following three of the most frequent pathogenic genetic variations: aneuploidies, microdeletions and monogenic variants. The cfDNA screening results were compared to invasive prenatal or postnatal diagnostic test results for 1,090 qualified participants. The comprehensive cfDNA screening detected a genetic alteration in 135 pregnancies with 98.5% sensitivity and 99.3% specificity relative to standard diagnostics. Of 876 fetuses with suspected structural anomalies on ultrasound examination, comprehensive cfDNA screening identified 55 (56.1%) aneuploidies, 6 (6.1%) microdeletions and 37 (37.8%) single-gene pathogenic variants. The inclusion of targeted monogenic conditions alongside chromosomal aberrations led to a 60.7% increase (from 61 to 98) in the detection rate. Overall, these data provide preliminary evidence that a comprehensive cfDNA screening test can accurately identify fetal pathogenic variants at both the chromosome and single-gene levels in high-risk pregnancies through a noninvasive approach, which has the potential to improve prenatal evaluation of fetal risks for severe genetic conditions arising from heterogenous molecular etiologies. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: ChiCTR2100045739 .

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsNoninvasive Prenatal TestingAneuploidyFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisProspective StudiesCell-Free Nucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID38253798
OpenAlexW4391105145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.