Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38253770›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2024

An automated deep learning pipeline for EMVI classification and response prediction of rectal cancer using baseline MRI: a multi-centre study.

Lishan Cai, Doenja M J Lambregts, Geerard L Beets, Monique Maas, Eduardo H P Pooch, Corentin Guérendel, Regina G H Beets-Tan, Sean Benson

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Imaging genomics of cancer: a bibliometric analysis and review.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Predicting malignant risk of ground-glass nodules using convolutional neural networks based on dual-time-pointCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lishan CaiDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3282-291X
Doenja M J LambregtsDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Geerard L BeetsGROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 66202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1671-9912
Monique MaasDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eduardo H P PoochDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Corentin GuérendelDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Regina G H Beets-TanDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sean BensonDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.benson@nki.nl.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classification of extramural vascular invasion status using baseline magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer has gained significant attention as it is an important prognostic marker. Also, the accurate prediction of patients achieving complete response with primary staging MRI assists clinicians in determining subsequent treatment plans. Most studies utilised radiomics-based methods, requiring manually annotated segmentation and handcrafted features, which tend to generalise poorly. We retrospectively collected 509 patients from 9 centres, and proposed a fully automated pipeline for EMVI status classification and CR prediction with diffusion weighted imaging and T2-weighted imaging. We applied nnUNet, a self-configuring deep learning model, for tumour segmentation and employed learned multiple-level image features to train classification models, named MLNet. This ensures a more comprehensive representation of the tumour features, in terms of both fine-grained detail and global context. On external validation, MLNet, yielding similar AUCs as internal validation, outperformed 3D ResNet10, a deep neural network with ten layers designed for analysing spatiotemporal data, in both CR and EMVI tasks. For CR prediction, MLNet showed better results than the current state-of-the-art model using imaging and clinical features in the same external cohort. Our study demonstrated that incorporating multi-level image representations learned by a deep learning based tumour segmentation model on primary MRI improves the results of EMVI classification and CR prediction with good generalisation to external data. We observed variations in the contributions of individual feature maps to different classification tasks. This pipeline has the potential to be applied in clinical settings, particularly for EMVI classification.

Identifiers

PMID38253770
PMCPMC10803303
OpenAlexW4391100529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.