Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38253743›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2024

Normative data beyond the total scores: a process score analysis of the Rey's 15 word test in healthy aging and Alzheimer's Disease.

Marina Gasparini, Michele Scandola, Stefania Amato, Emanuela Salati, Elena Facci, Valeria Gobbetto, Giuseppe Bruno, Nicola Vanacore, Giuseppe Gambina, Valentina Moro

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An updated italian normative data for a short version of the stroop colour word test.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  2. The False Recognition Test, a new tool for the assessment of false memories, with normative data from an Italian sample.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marina GaspariniCognitive and Language Rehabilitation Center "Sinapsy", Rome, Italy. marinamichela.gasparini@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1125-8951
Michele ScandolaDepartment Human Sciences, Verona University, Verona, Italy.
Stefania AmatoVerona Memory Center - CEMS, Verona, Italy.
Emanuela SalatiDepartment Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Elena FacciVerona Memory Center - CEMS, Verona, Italy.
Valeria GobbettoVerona Memory Center - CEMS, Verona, Italy.
Giuseppe BrunoDepartment Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Nicola VanacoreNational Health Institute, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe GambinaVerona Memory Center - CEMS, Verona, Italy.
Valentina MoroDepartment Human Sciences, Verona University, Verona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Rey's 15 words test is currently the most frequently used task in Italy to detect memory deficits in AD. The current standardised version is however quite outdated and lacks some cognitive indexes which may highlight problems in recall or encoding processes. The aim of the study was to update the normative data of the test and to consider some variables which were not accounted for in the original study, that is, recognition, learning rate and forgetfulness. We also adopted the process scores approach to ascertain the effects of serial position (primacy and recency).

methodsThree hundred ninety-six healthy participants were recruited. To detect any variables useful for intercepting the early stages of dementia, a group of 208 patients in the very early stage of AD was also recruited. Linear models were used to calculate the corrections scores for age, education, and gender, and ROCs were used to calculate cut-offs based on the maximum sum of sensitivity and specificity and the positive and negative predictive values.

resultsAll main indexes showed excellent Area Under the Curve (0.90-1), strong sensitivity and PPVs for distinguishing between the HCs and AD participants. However, the Intrusions index performed poorly in all parameters.

conclusionThe study provides updated, normative data which may be reliably used as a cognitive marker to detect early AD. The strength of the study is the large sample size and the number of indexes which make it possible to explore the utility of memory test process scores.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseHealthy AgingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMemory DisordersMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsReference ValuesSensitivity and SpecificityAgingAlzheimer’s DiseaseSerial position effectVerbal memoryWord-list learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.