ArticleScientific reports2024
Classification feasibility test on multi-lead electrocardiography signals generated from single-lead electrocardiography signals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wearable Electrocardiogram Technologies for the Early Detection of Acute Coronary Syndromes.JACC. Asia · 2026Review
- Generative Adversarial Networks for Modeling Bio-Electric Fields in Medicine: A Review of EEG, ECG, EMG, and EOG Applications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Higher-dimensional embedding of time-series data for machine learning.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Long-term, ambulatory 12-lead ECG from a single non-standard lead using perceptual reconstruction.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Intersection of epilepsy and cardiac health: Insights from electrocardiography and syndromic associations.Epilepsia · 2025Review
- Research on atrial fibrillation diagnosis in electrocardiograms based on CLA-AF model.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Progress in diagnosis and treatment of hypertension combined with left ventricular hypertrophy.Annals of medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nowadays, Electrocardiogram (ECG) signals can be measured using wearable devices, such as smart watches. Most wearable devices provide only a few details; however, they have the advantage of recording data in real time. In this study, 12-lead ECG signals were generated from lead I and their feasibility was tested to obtain more details. The 12-lead ECG signals were generated using a U-net-based generative adversarial network (GAN) that was trained on ECG data obtained from the Asan Medical Center. Subsequently, unseen PTB-XL PhysioNet data were used to produce real 12-lead ECG signals for classification. The generated and real 12-lead ECG signals were then compared using a ResNet classification model; and the normal, atrial fibrillation (A-fib), left bundle branch block (LBBB), right bundle branch block (RBBB), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), and right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) were classified. The mean precision, recall, and f1-score for the real 12-lead ECG signals are 0.70, 0.72, and 0.70, and that for the generated 12-lead ECG signals are 0.82, 0.80, and 0.81, respectively. In our study, according to the result generated 12-lead ECG signals performed better than real 12-lead ECG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.