Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38253709›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2024

Viable tumor cell density after neoadjuvant chemotherapy assessed using deep learning model reflects the prognosis of osteosarcoma.

Kengo Kawaguchi, Kazuki Miyama, Makoto Endo, Ryoma Bise, Kenichi Kohashi, Takeshi Hirose, Akira Nabeshima, Toshifumi Fujiwara, Yoshihiro Matsumoto, Yoshinao Oda and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kengo Kawaguchi *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Kazuki Miyama *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Makoto EndoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan. endo.m.a40@m.kyushu-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7956-2190
Ryoma BiseDepartment of Advanced Information Technology, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-Ku, Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan.
Kenichi KohashiDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Takeshi HiroseDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1588-9757
Akira NabeshimaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Toshifumi FujiwaraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Yoshihiro MatsumotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Yoshinao OdaDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Yasuharu NakashimaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Kyushu University · JPFukushima Medical University · JP

Funding

MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) JP18K16627MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) JP23K08700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for osteosarcoma is generally predicted using manual necrosis-rate assessments; however, necrosis rates obtained in these assessments are not reproducible and do not adequately reflect individual cell responses. We aimed to investigate whether viable tumor cell density assessed using a deep-learning model (DLM) reflects the prognosis of osteosarcoma. Seventy-one patients were included in this study. Initially, the DLM was trained to detect viable tumor cells, following which it calculated their density. Patients were stratified into high and low-viable tumor cell density groups based on DLM measurements, and survival analysis was performed to evaluate disease-specific survival and metastasis-free survival (DSS and MFS). The high viable tumor cell density group exhibited worse DSS (p = 0.023) and MFS (p = 0.033). DLM-evaluated viable density showed correct stratification of prognosis groups. Therefore, this evaluation method may enable precise stratification of the prognosis in osteosarcoma patients treated with NAC.

Identifiers

PMID38253709
PMCPMC10803362
OpenAlexW4391110131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.