Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38253651›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Residual dynamics learning for trajectory tracking for multi-rotor aerial vehicles.

Geesara Kulathunga, Hany Hamed, Alexandr Klimchik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Geesara KulathungaCentre for Robotics and Mechatronics Components, Innopolis University, Innopolis, Russia, 420500. gkulathunga@lincoln.ac.uk.
Hany HamedAdvanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, 28210, South Korea.
Alexandr KlimchikSchool of Computer Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, LN6, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a technique to model the residual dynamics between a high-level planner and a low-level controller by considering reference trajectory tracking in a cluttered environment as an example scenario. We focus on minimising residual dynamics that arise due to only the kinematical modelling of high-level planning. The kinematical modelling is sufficient for such scenarios due to safety constraints and aggressive manoeuvres that are difficult to perform when the environment is cluttered and dynamic. We used a simplified motion model to represent the motion of the quadrotor when formulating the high-level planner. The Sparse Gaussian Process Regression-based technique is proposed to model the residual dynamics. Recently proposed Data-Driven MPC is targeting aggressive manoeuvres without considering obstacle constraints. The proposed technique is compared with Data-Driven MPC to estimate the residual dynamics error without considering obstacle constraints. The comparison results yield that the proposed technique helps to reduce the nominal model error by a factor of 2 on average. Further, the proposed complete framework was compared with four other trajectory-tracking approaches in terms of tracking the reference trajectory without colliding with obstacles. The proposed approach outperformed the others with less flight time without losing computational efficiency.

Identifiers

PMID38253651
PMCPMC10810356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.