Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38253549›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2024

Patients' experiences of GP consultations following the introduction of the new GP contract in Scotland: a cross-sectional survey.

Kieran D Sweeney, Eddie Donaghy, David Henderson, Huayi Huang, Harry Hx Wang, Andrew Thompson, Bruce Guthrie, Stewart W Mercer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ONS Health Insight Survey in general practice: insight, not oversight.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Primary care transformation in Scotland: a qualitative evaluation of the views of patients.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kieran D SweeneyUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0805-7138
Eddie DonaghyUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
David HendersonUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Huayi HuangUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Harry Hx WangSchool of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Andrew ThompsonSchool of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Bruce GuthrieUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Stewart W MercerUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1703-3664

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe new Scottish GP contract commenced in April 2018 with a stated aim of mitigating health inequalities.

aimTo determine the health characteristics and experiences of patients consulting GPs in deprived urban (DU), affluent urban (AU), and remote and rural (RR) areas of Scotland. DESIGN AND

settingIn 2022, a postal survey of a random sample of adult patients from 12 practices who had consulted a GP within the previous 30 days was undertaken.

methodPatient characteristics and consultation experiences in the three areas (DU, AU, RR) were evaluated using validated measures including the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure and Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI).

resultsIn total, 1053 responses were received. In DU areas, multimorbidity was more common (78% versus 58% AU versus 68% RR,

conclusionFour years after the start of the new GP contract in Scotland, patients' experiences of GP consultations suggest that the inverse care law persists.

Indexed as

Family PracticePatient SatisfactionAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHumansReferral and ConsultationScotlandSurveys and Questionnairesgeneral practicehealth inequalitiesinverse care lawpatient satisfactionremote and ruralremote consultation, Scottish GP contract

Identifiers

PMID38253549
PMCPMC10824335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.